Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't

By D. Sackett, W. Rosenberg, James Douglas Allan Gray, Haynes Rb, W. Richardson. 1996

Subfields: Evaluation & Benchmarks

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Evaluation & Benchmarks

1. Jimmy J. Lin
2. Rodrigo Nogueira
3. Andrew Yates
4. Dina Demner-Fushman
5. D. Knudson
6. C. Hendricks Brown
7. Michael H. Bowling
8. William R. Hersh

Citations in the corpus

• Pretrained Transformers for Text Ranking: BERT and Beyond (2020, background): “hich is a fancy name for the common sensical idea that physicians make “conscientious, explicit, and judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions about the care of individual patients” [Sackett et al., 1996]. To provide an over-simplified example, when deciding between two drugs to pres”
• Evidence-based policymaking: promise, challenges and opportunities for accounting and financial markets research** (2018, unknown): “Even in evidence-based medicine, expert knowledge and context are relevant and still needed (Sackett et al. 1996).”
• Factors influencing the implementation of clinical guidelines for health care professionals: A systematic meta-review (2008, background): “Clinical guidelines, in the sense of scientifically developed statements to assist practitioner and patient decision-making about appropriate care for specific clinical conditions, may be important instruments to shape evidence based medicine [1,4].”