HCR-20: Violence risk management companion guide

128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

VIOLENCE RISK ASSESSMENT: Getting Specific About Being Dynamic (2005, background): “Instead, clinicians make final risk ratings of low, moderate, or high risk for violence that are explicitly tied to anticipated levels of intervention efforts and a consideration of risk factors that have support within the scientific and professional literatures (Douglas & Kropp, 2002; Douglas et a”
Advances in offender assessment and rehabilitation: Contributions of the risk–needs–responsivity approach (2004, background): “Such movement is welcome as the current emphasis in the risk assessment literature is a move toward risk management (Douglas et al. , 2002).”
Assessment and Management of Risk for Intimate Partner Violence by Police Officers Using the Brief Spousal Assault Form for the Evaluation of Risk (2014, background): “…intervention (e.g., Andrews & Bonta, 2006; Andrews, Bonta, & Wormith, 2006) as well as offered evidence in support of the violence prevention model that is the basis for all structured professional judgment (SPJ) risk assessment instruments (e.g., Douglas & Kropp, 2002; Hart, 1998, 2001).”