Paul D. Windschitl

2002–2008

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 1 researcher and is trusted by 2 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Whom Paul D. Windschitl trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Amos Tversky
  2. Paul Slovic
  3. Justin Kruger

Who trusts Paul D. Windschitl overall

  1. Valerie F. Reyna
  2. Mark A. Burgman

Papers from Paul D. Windschitl's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Paul D. Windschitl trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. The truly false consensus effect: an ineradicable and egocentric bias in social perception.
  2. Putting Adjustment Back in the Anchoring and Adjustment Heuristic: Differential Processing of Self-Generated and Experimenter-Provided Anchors (Psychology Science)
  3. Incorporating the Irrelevant: Anchors in Judgments of Belief and Value
  4. The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes
  5. PSYCHOLOGY OF PREFERENCES
  6. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases.
  7. Egocentrism and focalism in unrealistic optimism (and pessimism)
  8. The case for motivated reasoning.
  9. A model of dual attitudes. (Psychology Review)
  10. How We Know What Isn't So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life

Their papers