L. Langfeldt

Statistics and Probability · 2006–2019

A researcher in the Science corpus: 4 papers; trusts 6 researchers and is trusted by 11 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom L. Langfeldt trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Ludo Waltman
  2. Anthony F. J. van Raan
  3. Charles Auffray
  4. Lutz Bornmann
  5. Dag W. Aksnes

Who trusts L. Langfeldt overall

  1. Lauren A. Rivera
  2. Ismael Rafols
  3. Katherine C. Kellogg
  4. Kevin J. Boudreau
  5. Loet Leydesdorff
  6. Linus Dahlander
  7. Erin Leahey
  8. Dag W. Aksnes
  9. Alice O'Hare
  10. Julie Thompson Klein

Papers from L. Langfeldt's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers L. Langfeldt trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior (J. Documentation)
  2. Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences? (Scientometrics)
  3. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
  4. A review of the literature on citation impact indicators (J. Informetrics)
  5. Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations (J. Informetrics)
  6. Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups (Scientometrics)
  7. CHARACTERISTICS OF HIGHLY CITED PAPERS
  8. Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators: a comparative study at a Norwegian university
  9. How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (PLoS ONE)
  10. What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? a literature survey (J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.)

Their papers