Anthony F. J. van Raan
Statistics and Probability · 2001–2014
A researcher in the Science corpus: 8 papers; trusts 9 researchers and is trusted by 38 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Statistics and Probability — 14 citations into it; #1,237 of 12,932 by trust here, #1,662 by citations
- Political Science and International Relations — 5 citations into it; #4,611 of 4,701 by trust here, #2,764 by citations
Whom Anthony F. J. van Raan trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- Jorge E. Hirsch
- Ludo Waltman
- Henk F. Moed
- Nees Jan van Eck
- Philip Ball
- M. Matzke
- Peter Weingart
- Anton J. Nederhof
- Ronald N. Kostoff
Who trusts Anthony F. J. van Raan overall
- John C. Mingers
- Loet Leydesdorff
- Lutz Bornmann
- Ludo Waltman
- Ming-Huang Wang
- Celeste Amorim Varum
- Dag W. Aksnes
- Judit Bar-Ilan
- Hans-Dieter Daniel
- Hui-Zhen Fu
Papers from Anthony F. J. van Raan's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers Anthony F. J. van Raan trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- The Impact of League Tables and Ranking Systems on Higher Education Decision Making
- A short history of SHELX.
- Rickety numbers: Volatility of university rankings and policy implications
- Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance (Scientometrics)
- The world-class university and ranking : aiming beyond status
- Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals (J. Informetrics)
- The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation (J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol.)
- Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? (Scientometrics)
- Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences? (Scientometrics)
- Index aims for fair ranking of scientists (Nature)
Their papers
- Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods (2005) — 806 citations
- Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index and its consequencesfor international comparisons of national research performance (2001) — 448 citations
- Towards a new crown indicator: Some theoretical considerations (2010) — 423 citations
- Comparison of the Hirsch-index with standard bibliometric indicators and with peer judgment for 147 chemistry research groups (2005) — 437 citations
- The Leiden ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation (2012) — 444 citations
- The use of bibliometric analysis in research performance assessment and monitoring of interdisciplinary scientific developments (2003) — 120 citations
- Advances in bibliometric analysis: research performance assessment and science mapping (2014) — 170 citations
- Sleeping Beauties in science (2004) — 351 citations