M. V. van Tulder

Pharmacology · 2000–2018

A researcher in the Science corpus: 12 papers; trusts 8 researchers and is trusted by 5 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Pharmacology — 24 citations into it; #416 of 1,112 by trust here, #164 by citations
• Statistics and Probability — 21 citations into it; #11,348 of 12,932 by trust here, #3,255 by citations
• Pathology and Forensic Medicine — 17 citations into it; #231 of 414 by trust here, #143 by citations
• Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health — 10 citations into it; #1,721 of 2,368 by trust here, #513 by citations
• General Health Professions — 9 citations into it
• Occupational Therapy — 7 citations into it; #99 of 133 by trust here, #19 by citations
• Surgery — 6 citations into it

Whom M. V. van Tulder trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Julian P. T. Higgins
2. J. Hayden
3. B. Koes
4. J. Sterne
5. Andrea Furlan

Who trusts M. V. van Tulder overall

1. J. Hayden
2. R. Chou
3. John D. Childs
4. B. Koes
5. A. Malmivaara
6. Christopher G. Maher
7. George Tomlinson
8. J. Fritz
9. Andrea Furlan

Papers from M. V. van Tulder's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers M. V. van Tulder trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on. (Journal of the Medical Library Association)
2. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations (British medical journal)
3. Systematic Review: Strategies for Using Exercise Therapy To Improve Outcomes in Chronic Low Back Pain (Annals of Internal Medicine)
4. Improving the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials. (Journal of Wound Care)
5. Exercise Therapy for Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review Within the Framework of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group (Spine)
6. Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis. (British medical journal)
7. Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: Consensus on Health Economic Criteria (International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care)
8. Interpreting Change Scores for Pain and Functional Status in Low Back Pain: Towards International Consensus Regarding Minimal Important Change (Spine)
9. Bayesian Approaches to Clinical Trials and Health‐Care Evaluation
10. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes, 3rd ed

Their papers

• Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: Consensus on Health Economic Criteria (2005) — 799 citations
• 2009 Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group (2009) — 1,565 citations
• Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group (2003) — 2,130 citations
• Clinical practice guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care: an updated overview (2018) — 1,271 citations
• 2015 Updated Method Guideline for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back and Neck Group (2015) — 628 citations
• An updated overview of clinical guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care (2010) — 1,274 citations
• A systematic review on the effectiveness of physical and rehabilitation interventions for chronic non-specific low back pain (2010) — 704 citations
• Meta-Analysis: Exercise Therapy for Nonspecific Low Back Pain (2005) — 606 citations
• Systematic Review: Strategies for Using Exercise Therapy To Improve Outcomes in Chronic Low Back Pain (2005) — 886 citations
• Exercise therapy for treatment of non-specific low back pain. (2005) — 954 citations
• Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Low Back Pain in Primary Care: An International Comparison (2001) — 733 citations
• Exercise Therapy for Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review Within the Framework of the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group (2000) — 617 citations