Improving the quality of reporting in randomised controlled trials.

By A. Walker, J. Nixon. Journal of Wound Care, 2004

1,049 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Occupational Therapy, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Rehabilitation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7fa06f53c9e9644b9035d2794052f27b2e433ec5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Occupational Therapy

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

In Rehabilitation

Citations in the corpus

CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010, background): “) and Drummond Rennie organizing the first CONSORT statement in 1996 (5).”
Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM): A Guide for Authors and Reviewers. (2020, neutral): “A number of valuable manuscript checklists have come into widespread use, including the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) (2–5), Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) (6), and Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) (7”
CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010, neutral): “Two initiatives aimed at developing reporting guidelines culminated in one of us (DM) and Drummond Rennie organising the first CONSORT statement in 1996 [5].”
Essential Medical Statistics (2003, background): “Over the last decade concerted attempts to improve the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials resulted in the 1996 CONSORT statement (Begg et al., 1996), with a revised version in 2001 (Moher et al.”
Meta-Analysis: Exercise Therapy for Nonspecific Low Back Pain (2005, background): “Journals in the field of back pain should adopt reporting guidelines (98) and, even more important, use them in their review process to improve the quality of future reports of trials in this field.”
Reporting guidelines for health care simulation research: extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE statements (2016, background): “Failure to adequately describe the key elements of a research study impairs the efforts of editors, reviewers, and readers to critically appraise strengths and weaknesses [24, 25] or apply and replicate findings [26].”
Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa (2012, background): “SORT) Statement [1], which has been revised and updated twice [2,3], each with a companion explanatory”
Machine learning for identifying Randomized Controlled Trials: An evaluation and practitioner's guide (2018, methodology): “A key pressure for change in reporting comes from the CONSORT guidelines, first published in 1996, which advise that RCT publications must include the term Randomized Controlled Trial in the title.(32) Increased explicit reporting and standardized phrasing would be expected (in theory) to improve th”
Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care (2006, positive): “Third, a high priority must be the development of uniform standards for the reporting of research on implementation of health information technology, similar to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statements for randomized, controlled trials and the Quality of Reporting of Meta-”
Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Chemoembolization improves survival (2003, result): “The remaining 47 studies were excluded, either because they compared 2 active antitumoral treatments in 35 cases (involving percutaneous treatments [5],22-26 arterial embolization or chemoembolization [10],34-43 arterial lipiodolization or arterial chemotherapy [8],44-46,48-51,53 internal radiation ”
CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (2008, methodology): “The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) Statement, first published in 1996 [21] and updated in 2001 [22], provides recommendations for reporting RCTs in health-care journals.”
SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool for animal studies (2014, methodology): “Clear guidelines for reporting and methodological quality [25] Evolving guidelines for reporting and methodological quality [2,23,24]”
Positive Outcomes Influence the Rate and Time to Publication, but Not the Impact Factor of Publications of Clinical Trial Results (2013, methodology): “Criteria used to match identified publications to trials were classified as fixed, which should be included in the publication according to CONSORT guidelines [16], and optional, when their inclusion in the article was per author decision.”
CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomised Trials (2010, neutral): “[5] Further methodological research on similar topics reinforced earlier findings [15] and fed into the revision of 2001.”
Using the Delphi expert consensus method in mental health research (2015, methodology): “Not only are Levels of Evidence statements themselves based on expert consensus, but so are other tools like the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Higgins and Green, 2011), the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) Statement on standards for reporting trials (”