Andrea Furlan

Statistics and Probability · 2003–2015

A researcher in the Science corpus: 4 papers; trusts 2 researchers and is trusted by 2 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Andrea Furlan trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Julian P. T. Higgins
  2. Julie May Glanville
  3. J. Sterne
  4. Matthias Egger
  5. Carol Lefebvre
  6. S. Green
  7. Jeremy Miles
  8. M. V. van Tulder

Who trusts Andrea Furlan overall

  1. Mieke Heyvaert
  2. J. Hayden
  3. C. Terwee
  4. R. Chou
  5. M. V. van Tulder
  6. B. Maes
  7. L. Manchikanti

Papers from Andrea Furlan's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Andrea Furlan trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on. (Journal of the Medical Library Association)
  2. Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: Consensus on Health Economic Criteria (International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care)
  3. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations (British medical journal)
  4. Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis. (British medical journal)
  5. Interpreting Change Scores for Pain and Functional Status in Low Back Pain: Towards International Consensus Regarding Minimal Important Change (Spine)
  6. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes, 3rd ed
  7. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (International Coaching Psychology Review)
  8. Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science (Biomedical Digital Libraries)
  9. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (Annals of Internal Medicine)
  10. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)

Their papers