Clinical Guidelines for the Management of Low Back Pain in Primary Care: An International Comparison

733 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Non-specific low back pain. (2012, unknown): “Today there are guidelines frommany countries and their recommendations are quite consistent [45].”
A Clinical Prediction Rule To Identify Patients with Low Back Pain Most Likely To Benefit from Spinal Manipulation: A Validation Study (2004, background): “These conflicting conclusions are reflected in the various recommendations in national clinical practice guidelines, with some recommending manipulation and others not (8).”
The Fear-Avoidance Model of Musculoskeletal Pain: Current State of Scientific Evidence (2006, background): “…beliefs themselves, although fortunately the beliefs of health care providers generally appear to be in accordance with current guidelines (Koes et al., 2001), advising the continuation of normal activities including work even when in pain, and discouraging sick leave (Linton et al.,…”
An updated overview of clinical guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care (2010, methodology): “A previous systematic review of clinical practice guidelines was conducted in 2001 [6].”