Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: Consensus on Health Economic Criteria

By S. Evers, M. Goossens, HC de Vet, M. V. van Tulder, A. Ament. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 2005

799 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/e1e4978a1e019e003cf79825bd8ff10e16fecea3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. L. Mokkink
2. Lex M. Bouter
3. HC de Vet
4. C. Terwee
5. Jordi Alonso
6. D.walaa badawy
7. R. Deyo
8. P. Stratford

In Sociology and Political Science

1. C. Terwee
2. L. Mokkink
3. Lex M. Bouter
4. M. V. van Tulder
5. HC de Vet
6. D.walaa badawy
7. Jordi Alonso
8. Dirk L. Knol

In Statistics and Probability

1. L. Mokkink
2. C. Terwee
3. HC de Vet
4. Lex M. Bouter
5. Jordi Alonso
6. D.walaa badawy
7. M. V. van Tulder
8. Dirk L. Knol

Citations in the corpus

• The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. (2010, methodology): “Based on previous experiences with Delphi studies [6,7], we decided to invite at least 80 experts to participate in our panel to ensure 30 responders in the last round.”
• 2015 Updated Method Guideline for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back and Neck Group (2015, methodology): “2 checklists that are recommended for the risk of bias assessment of full economic evaluations alongside RCTs are the British Medical Journal Checklist for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions(63) and the CHEC list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations.(64)”