L. Slocum

Sociology and Political Science · 2005–2013

A researcher in the Science corpus: 4 papers; trusts 9 researchers and is trusted by 18 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom L. Slocum trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Stephen Demuth
  2. P. Kautt
  3. R. Agnew
  4. Stewart J. D’Alessio
  5. Eric P. Baumer
  6. C. Spohn
  7. M. Kurlychek
  8. Brian David Johnson
  9. P. Mazerolle
  10. Nicole Leeper Piquero

Who trusts L. Slocum overall

  1. Stephen W. Baron
  2. Jeffery T. Ulmer
  3. J. Turanovic
  4. D. Osgood
  5. A. Day
  6. Xia Wang
  7. Travis C. Pratt
  8. Yanfeng Zheng

Papers from L. Slocum's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers L. Slocum trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. RACIAL AND ETHNIC DIFFERENCES IN PRETRIAL RELEASE DECISIONS AND OUTCOMES: A COMPARISON OF HISPANIC, BLACK, AND WHITE FELONY ARRESTEES*
  2. Race and the Probability of Arrest
  3. THE EFFECT OF IMPRISONMENT ON RECIDIVISM RATES OF FELONY OFFENDERS: A FOCUS ON DRUG OFFENDERS*
  4. Analyzing Multiple-Item Measures of Crime and Deviance I: Item Response Theory Scaling
  5. ETHNICITY AND JUDGES' SENTENCING DECISIONS: HISPANIC‐BLACK‐WHITE COMPARISONS
  6. THE MULTILEVEL CONTEXT OF CRIMINAL SENTENCING: INTEGRATING JUDGE- AND COUNTY-LEVEL INFLUENCES *
  7. THE RULES HAVE CHANGED‐SO PROCEED WITH CAUTION: A COMMENT ON ENGEN AND GAINEY'S METHOD FOR MODELING SENTENCING OUTCOMES UNDER GUIDELINES
  8. Nonlinear statistical modeling: Semiparametric estimation of censored selection models
  9. BILEVEL DISPARITIES IN COURT DISPOSITIONS FOR INTIMATE ASSAULT
  10. THE JUVENILE PENALTY: A COMPARISON OF JUVENILE AND YOUNG ADULT SENTENCING OUTCOMES IN CRIMINAL COURT*

Their papers