Stephen Demuth

Sociology and Political Science · 2000–2014

A researcher in the Science corpus: 11 papers; trusts 8 researchers and is trusted by 48 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Stephen Demuth trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. D. Steffensmeier
  2. C. Spohn
  3. Jeffery T. Ulmer
  4. Mark E. Hill
  5. Brian David Johnson
  6. J. Kramer
  7. R. Gainey

Who trusts Stephen Demuth overall

  1. Jeffery T. Ulmer
  2. Traci Schlesinger
  3. Xia Wang
  4. Kareem L. Jordan
  5. Tina L. Freiburger
  6. J. Wooldredge
  7. S. Bushway
  8. Brian David Johnson
  9. D. Steffensmeier
  10. D. Mears

Papers from Stephen Demuth's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Stephen Demuth trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Ethnicity and Sentencing Outcomes in U.S. Federal Courts: Who is Punished More Harshly? (American Sociological Review)
  2. Thirty Years of Sentencing Reform: The Quest for a Racially Neutral Sentencing Process
  3. RACIAL AND ETHNIC DISPARITIES IN SENTENCING DEPARTURES ACROSS MODES OF CONVICTION
  4. DOWNWARD DEPARTURES FOR SERIOUS VIOLENT OFFENDERS: LOCAL COURT “CORRECTIONS” TO PENNSYLVANIA'S SENTENCING GUIDELINES*
  5. THE EFFECT OF GENDER ON THE DECISION TO INCARCERATE BEFORE AND AFTER THE INTRODUCTION OF SENTENCING GUIDELINES
  6. The Invisible Woman: Gender, Crime, and Justice
  7. What You Can and Can’t Properly Do with Regression
  8. ETHNICITY AND JUDGES' SENTENCING DECISIONS: HISPANIC‐BLACK‐WHITE COMPARISONS
  9. MODELING THE EFFECTS OF LEGALLY RELEVANT AND EXTRALEGAL FACTORS UNDER SENTENCING GUIDELINES: THE RULES HAVE CHANGED
  10. RACIAL AND ETHNIC DIFFERENCES IN PRETRIAL RELEASE DECISIONS AND OUTCOMES: A COMPARISON OF HISPANIC, BLACK, AND WHITE FELONY ARRESTEES*

Their papers