Brian David Johnson

Sociology and Political Science · 2003–2016

A researcher in the Science corpus: 9 papers; trusts 19 researchers and is trusted by 49 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Sociology and Political Science — 122 citations into it; #673 of 22,756 by trust here, #1,957 by citations
• Clinical Psychology — 60 citations into it; #339 of 8,024 by trust here, #1,571 by citations
• Economics and Econometrics — 16 citations into it; #20,572 of 23,481 by trust here, #20,730 by citations
• Law — 13 citations into it
• Health — 9 citations into it
• Political Science and International Relations — 7 citations into it

Whom Brian David Johnson trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. P. Kautt
2. Stephen Demuth
3. D. Steffensmeier
4. Jeffery T. Ulmer
5. C. Spohn
6. S. Bushway
7. M. Kurlychek
8. Ronald Helms
9. Eric P. Baumer
10. R. Gainey

Who trusts Brian David Johnson overall

1. Jeffery T. Ulmer
2. Xia Wang
3. D. Mears
4. J. Wooldredge
5. Eric P. Baumer
6. S. Bushway
7. B. Kutateladze
8. James Eisenstein
9. Paul Nieuwbeerta
10. Jeffrey Lin

Papers from Brian David Johnson's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Brian David Johnson trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Ethnicity and Sentencing Outcomes in U.S. Federal Courts: Who is Punished More Harshly? (American Sociological Review)
2. Thirty Years of Sentencing Reform: The Quest for a Racially Neutral Sentencing Process
3. Social context and racial disparities in punishment decisions
4. IMAGES OF DANGER AND CULPABILITY: RACIAL STEREOTYPING, CASE PROCESSING, AND CRIMINAL SENTENCING*
5. THE EFFECT OF GENDER ON THE DECISION TO INCARCERATE BEFORE AND AFTER THE INTRODUCTION OF SENTENCING GUIDELINES
6. SEX‐BASED DISPARITIES IN FELONY DISPOSITIONS BEFORE VERSUS AFTER SENTENCING REFORM IN OHIO*
7. CONTEXTUAL DISPARITIES IN GUIDELINES DEPARTURES: COURTROOM SOCIAL CONTEXTS, GUIDELINES COMPLIANCE, AND EXTRALEGAL DISPARITIES IN CRIMINAL SENTENCING1
8. THE JUVENILE PENALTY: A COMPARISON OF JUVENILE AND YOUNG ADULT SENTENCING OUTCOMES IN CRIMINAL COURT*
9. THE MULTILEVEL CONTEXT OF CRIMINAL SENTENCING: INTEGRATING JUDGE- AND COUNTY-LEVEL INFLUENCES *
10. The Impact of Gender and Race-Ethnicity in the Pretrial Release Process

Their papers

• RACIAL AND ETHNIC DISPARITIES IN SENTENCING DEPARTURES ACROSS MODES OF CONVICTION (2003) — 255 citations
• THE MULTILEVEL CONTEXT OF CRIMINAL SENTENCING: INTEGRATING JUDGE- AND COUNTY-LEVEL INFLUENCES * (2006) — 401 citations
• Is the Magic Still There? The Use of the Heckman Two-Step Correction for Selection Bias in Criminology (2007) — 613 citations
• CONTEXTUAL DISPARITIES IN GUIDELINES DEPARTURES: COURTROOM SOCIAL CONTEXTS, GUIDELINES COMPLIANCE, AND EXTRALEGAL DISPARITIES IN CRIMINAL SENTENCING1 (2005) — 226 citations
• THE JUVENILE PENALTY: A COMPARISON OF JUVENILE AND YOUNG ADULT SENTENCING OUTCOMES IN CRIMINAL COURT* (2004) — 154 citations
• Trial Penalties in Federal Sentencing: Extra‐Guidelines Factors and District Variation (2010) — 167 citations
• CUMULATIVE DISADVANTAGE: EXAMINING RACIAL AND ETHNIC DISPARITY IN PROSECUTION AND SENTENCING† (2014) — 408 citations
• Development and validation of a social media use integration scale. (2013) — 264 citations
• Opening Pandora’s Box: How Does Defendant Race Influence Plea Bargaining? (2016) — 122 citations