M. Kurlychek

Sociology and Political Science · 2004–2012

A researcher in the Science corpus: 5 papers; trusts 9 researchers and is trusted by 12 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom M. Kurlychek trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. D. Pager
  2. Larry A. Wasserman
  3. Arne Henningsen
  4. S. Bushway
  5. Brian David Johnson
  6. Robert W. Brame
  7. D. Steffensmeier
  8. Ott Toomet
  9. C. Spohn
  10. Dan Nagin

Who trusts M. Kurlychek overall

  1. S. Bushway
  2. Beth m. Huebner
  3. Joshua C. Cochran
  4. M. Berg
  5. Brian David Johnson
  6. Jeffery T. Ulmer
  7. D. Mears
  8. Robert W. Brame
  9. Xia Wang
  10. M. Leiber

Papers from M. Kurlychek's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers M. Kurlychek trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Ethnicity and Sentencing Outcomes in U.S. Federal Courts: Who is Punished More Harshly? (American Sociological Review)
  2. Bayesian Model Selection and Model Averaging. (Journal of Mathematical Psychology)
  3. ETHNICITY AND JUDGES' SENTENCING DECISIONS: HISPANIC‐BLACK‐WHITE COMPARISONS
  4. The Mark of a Criminal Record1 (American Journal of Sociology)
  5. BILEVEL DISPARITIES IN COURT DISPOSITIONS FOR INTIMATE ASSAULT
  6. maxLik: A package for maximum likelihood estimation in R (Computational statistics (Zeitschrift))
  7. MODELING THE EFFECTS OF LEGALLY RELEVANT AND EXTRALEGAL FACTORS UNDER SENTENCING GUIDELINES: THE RULES HAVE CHANGED
  8. CONTEXTUAL DISPARITIES IN GUIDELINES DEPARTURES: COURTROOM SOCIAL CONTEXTS, GUIDELINES COMPLIANCE, AND EXTRALEGAL DISPARITIES IN CRIMINAL SENTENCING1
  9. SEX‐BASED DISPARITIES IN FELONY DISPOSITIONS BEFORE VERSUS AFTER SENTENCING REFORM IN OHIO*
  10. DISCRETION AND DISPARITY UNDER SENTENCING GUIDELINES: THE ROLE OF DEPARTURES AND STRUCTURED SENTENCING ALTERNATIVES*

Their papers