THE EFFECT OF IMPRISONMENT ON RECIDIVISM RATES OF FELONY OFFENDERS: A FOCUS ON DRUG OFFENDERS*

By C. Spohn, David Holleran. 2002

321 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4f1c4c7bb08d0fac1d4963f53aaaa0f7b9246f92

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Juvenile Incarceration, Human Capital, and Future Crime: Evidence from Randomly Assigned Judges* (2015, unknown): “…that might bias estimates because judges are randomly assigned to cases and is the 3Some work finds that incarceration increases recidivism (Spohn and Holleran, 2002; Bernburg, Krohn and Rivera, 2006), others find that it has no effect (Gottfredson, 1999; Smith and Akers, 1993), and still…”
The Pains of Imprisonment Revisited: The Impact of Strain on Inmate Recidivism (2013, background): “Well-designed longitudinal studies, across cultures, now reveal that the effect of prison is, if anything, criminogenic (Cid, 2009; Nieuwbeerta, Nagin, & Blokland, 2009; Sampson & Laub, 1993; Smith, 2006; Spohn & Holleran, 2002).”
Indeterminate and Determinate Sentencing Models (2014, methodology): “Following previous studies (Bales, Bedard, Quinn, Ensley, & Holley, 2005; Dejong, 1997; French & Gendreau, 2006; Spohn & Holleran, 2002), the institutional factors included severity of punishment, criminal history, and prison infractions.”
Imprisonment and Reoffending (2009, background): “Spohn and Holleran (2002) Recidivism Yes Employment and predicted probability of imprisonment in 1993 (seriousness of offense, statutory classification of the offense, number of convictions, offender’s prior criminal record, whether the offender was on probation at the time of arrest, whether a gun…”
Race and Officer Decision Making: Examining Differences in Arrest Outcomes between Black and White Officers (2006, background): “…some of the differences between these models we estimate the probability of arrest involving White and Black officers (Hanushek & Jackson, 1977; Spohn & Holleran, 2002).17 When the factors they hold in common are present simultaneously (i.e., felony offense; intoxicated suspect; disrespectful…”
Comparing the effects of community service and short-term imprisonment on recidivism: a matched samples approach (2010, background): “Prior research has shown that these personal characteristics influence both the likelihood of receiving certain types of sanctions, as well as the probability of recidivism (e.g., Spohn and Holleran 2002; Nieuwbeerta et al. 2009).”
Women Coming Home: Long‐Term Patterns of Recidivism (2010, background): “Research that incorporates logistic and survival analyses has become quite common in recent years (e.g., Banks & Gottfredson, 2003; Spohn & Holleran, 2002).”
Men, Women, and Postrelease Offending (2012, result): “Multivariate analyses reinforce the strong, positive relationship between drug involvement and recidivism following release from prison for male and female samples (Huebner et al., 2010; Spohn & Holleran, 2002).”
The Effect of Racial Inequality on Black Male Recidivism (2007, background): “Multivariate analyses often find enduring effects of race even when controlling for key individual-level predictors of recidivism (Bales et al., 2005; Piquero, McDonald, & Parker, 2002; Smith & Paternoster, 1990; Spohn & Holleran, 2002; Wilson, 2005).”
Is the Magic Still There? The Use of the Heckman Two-Step Correction for Selection Bias in Criminology (2007, methodology): “ Spohn and Holleran (2002) is an example of an application of the treatment model where the probability was substituted for the inverse Mills ratio.”
Examining the Sources of Variation in Risk for Recidivism (2011, background): “As important, men serving time for drugrelated offenses (Spohn & Holleran, 2002) and those who are classified as drugdependent (Huebner, Varano, & Bynum, 2007) fail more quickly then similarly situated offenders.”