Personality and the prediction of consequential outcomes.

By D. Ozer, Verónica Benet‐Martínez. Annual Review of Psychology, 2006

2,185 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/af15e4f7fadc7e44fdac502ae122f3eef22f5807

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Clinical Psychology

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Testing Predictions From Personality Neuroscience: Brain Structure and the Big Five (2010, background): “The Big Five factors are important predictors of outcomes in mental and physical health, well-being, education, work, and relationships (Ozer & Benet-Martinez, 2006), and a theory of their biological roots is an important step toward the integration of individual differences research in psychology…”
Persons, behaviors and situations: An agenda for personality psychology in the postwar era (2009, background): “…to the point, measurements of personality – especially but not limited to measurements of five key traits of personality – can predict not only specific behaviors in the lab but also long-term, important life outcomes (Ozer & Benet-Martínez, 2006; Roberts, Kuncel, Shiner, Caspi, & Goldberg, 2007).”
Cybernetic Big Five Theory. (2015, background): “2 shows that traits have causal effects on life outcomes, such as health, occupation, access to resources, and personal relationships, because consistent patterns of behavior have consequences (Ozer & Benet-Martinez, 2006).”
Public Health Significance of Neuroticism (2009, background): “The extensive literature on associations between personality traits and aspects of subjective well being has been reviewed recently and will not be repeated here (Ozer & Benet-Martinez, 2006; Steel, Schmidt, & Shultz, 2008).”
Environmental sustainability and national personality (2014, background): “An individual’s standing on each of these personality trait dimensions affects a wide variety of important life outcomes, playing important roles in shaping cognition, motivation, and behavior (Ozer & Benet-Martínez, 2006; Roberts, Kuncel, Shiner, Caspi, & Goldberg, 2007).”
Personality predictors of Consumerism and Environmentalism: A preliminary study (2007, background): “These five trait domains appear to be crossculturally valid (McCrae & Costa, 1997), are relatively stable across the lifespan (Costa et al., 1997), and can be used to predict a variety of real-world outcomes (Ozer & Benet-Martinez, 2006).”
Personality Neuroscience and the Biology of Traits (2010, background): “Conscientiousness predicts academic and occupational success, as well as behavior that promote health and longevity (Ozer & Benet-Martinez, 2006).”
The Relationships among Attachment Style, Personality Traits, Interpersonal Competency, and Facebook Use (2012, background): “…impact of neuroticism negatively and extraversion positively affecting interpersonal competency (Berry & Hansen, 1996; Cuperman & Ickes, 2009; Ozer & Benet-Martinez, 2006) and Facebook use intensity (Amiel & Sargent, 2004; Back et al., 2010; Correa et al., 2010), as well as indirectly…”
Back to the Future: Personality and Assessment and Personality Development. (2009, positive): “They predict substantive outcomes, such as mortality, health, marital satisfaction, divorce, and occupational success (Ozer & Benet-Martinez, 2006; Roberts, Kuncel, Shiner, Caspi, & Goldberg, 2007).”
A Tail of Two Personalities: How Canine Companions Shape Relationships and Well-Being (2008, background): “Individuals' dispositions and skills shape the nature and quality of relationships (Ozer and Benet-Martinez, 2006).”
Personality, antisocial behavior, and aggression: A meta-analytic review (2011, background): “The domains and facets of the FFMhave also provenuseful in their relations to important outcomes (Ozer & Benet-Martinez, 2006), including a variety of externalizing behaviors (e.g. Flory, Lynam, Milich, Leukefeld, & Clayton, 2002;Hoyle, Fejfar, &Miller, 2000;Miller, Lynam,& Leukefeld, 2003).”
Emerging Positive Organizational Behavior (2007, background): “…as quality of relationships with peers, family, and romantic others; and organizational- or sociallevel outcomes such as occupational choice, satisfaction, performance, community involvement, criminal activity, and political ideology (for a comprehensive review, see Ozer & Benet-Martínez, 2006).”