D. Kidd

Literature and Literary Theory · 2013–2017

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 16 researchers and is trusted by 7 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom D. Kidd trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Raymond A. Mar
  2. Tania Singer
  3. Keith Oatley
  4. Simon Baron-Cohen
  5. F. D. de Waal
  6. Katrina Fong
  7. H. Markus
  8. Jordan B. Peterson
  9. Markus Appel
  10. Martin Brüne

Who trusts D. Kidd overall

  1. E. Koopman
  2. Michal Kosinski
  3. Raymond A. Mar
  4. F. Hakemulder
  5. Katharina Schäfer
  6. Maria Nikolajeva
  7. Rebecca A. Dore
  8. Tuomas Eerola
  9. Louis Tay

Papers from D. Kidd's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers D. Kidd trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" Test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. (Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines)
  2. Exploring the link between reading fiction and empathy: Ruling out individual differences and examining outcomes
  3. Bookworms versus nerds: Exposure to fiction versus non-fiction, divergent associations with social ability, and the simulation of fictional social worlds
  4. The Empathy Quotient: An Investigation of Adults with Asperger Syndrome or High Functioning Autism, and Normal Sex Differences (Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders)
  5. Effects of Literature on Empathy and Self-Reflection: A Theoretical-Empirical Framework
  6. Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing. (Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences)
  7. "Theory of mind" in schizophrenia: a review of the literature. (Schizophrenia bulletin)
  8. What You Read Matters: The Role of Fiction Genre in Predicting Interpersonal Sensitivity
  9. Fictional Narratives Cultivate Just‐World Beliefs
  10. Cultures and Selves (Perspectives on Psychological Science)

Their papers