Reading Literary Fiction Improves Theory of Mind

By D. Kidd, Emanuele Castano. Science, 2013

1,218 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A Good Read Theory of Mind is the human capacity to comprehend that other people hold beliefs and desires and that these may differ from one's own beliefs and desires. The currently predominant view is that literary fiction—often described as narratives that focus on in-depth portrayals of subjects' inner feelings and thoughts—can be linked to theory of mind processes, especially those that are involved in the understanding or simulation of the affective characteristics of the subjects. Kidd and Castano (p. 377, published online 3 October) provide experimental evidence that reading passages of literary fiction, in comparison to nonfiction or popular fiction, does indeed enhance the reader's performance on theory of mind tasks. Experimental evidence suggests that reading good fiction helps us to understand others. Understanding others’ mental states is a crucial skill that enables the complex social relationships that characterize human societies. Yet little research has investigated what fosters this skill, which is known as Theory of Mind (ToM), in adults. We present five experiments showing that reading literary fiction led to better performance on tests of affective ToM (experiments 1 to 5) and cognitive ToM (experiments 4 and 5) compared with reading nonfiction (experiments 1), popular fiction (experiments 2 to 5), or nothing at all (experiments 2 and 5). Specifically, these results show that reading literary fiction temporarily enhances ToM. More broadly, they suggest that ToM may be influenced by engagement with works of art.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/212301127d8826dc29424a5ddd74f6919820d012

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

  1. E. Koopman
  2. Kathy Hirsh-Pasek
  3. Raymond A. Mar
  4. Melissa G. Keith
  5. Michal Kosinski
  6. Tuomas Eerola
  7. Roberta Michnick Golinkoff 
  8. Louis Tay

In Social Psychology

  1. Raymond A. Mar
  2. E. Koopman
  3. F. Hakemulder
  4. Melissa G. Keith
  5. Michal Kosinski
  6. Tuomas Eerola
  7. Louis Tay
  8. Katharina Schäfer

Citations in the corpus