Cautionary Note on Reporting Eta-Squared Values from Multifactor ANOVA Designs

641 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Structure of Cultural Identity in an Ethnically Diverse Sample of Emerging Adults (2007, background): “gp refers to the partial eta-squared value (Pearce et al., 2004).”
MorePower 6.0 for ANOVA with relational confidence intervals and Bayesian analysis (2012, positive): “Using Raftery’s (1995) rules of thumb, the Bayesian results provided “very strong” evidence in favor of the alternative hypothesis.”
Eta- and partial eta-squared in L2 research: A cautionary review and guide to more appropriate usage (2018, methodology): “First, in line with previous studies that have examined the reporting and interpreting of η2 effect sizes (Levine and Hullett, 2002; Pierce et al., 2004), we computed the sum of the η2 values for every multi-way design in papers that reported them (i.”
Researcher Bias: The Use of Machine Learning in Software Defect Prediction (2014, methodology): “As is conventional ([38], [40], [41], [42]) we construct the model in decreasing order of partial eta squared scores”
A validation of eye movements as a measure of elementary school children's developing number sense (2008, background): “the explained variance proportion under the assumption that all other factors in the design are controlled for ( Pierce, Block, & Aguinis, 2004 ).”