Stefania Paolini
Sociology and Political Science · 2006–2021
A researcher in the Science corpus: 9 papers; trusts 15 researchers and is trusted by 9 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Sociology and Political Science — 131 citations into it; #7,758 of 22,756 by trust here, #3,518 by citations
- Social Psychology — 94 citations into it; #4,364 of 15,694 by trust here, #2,893 by citations
- Gender Studies — 29 citations into it; #4,167 of 4,924 by trust here, #1,942 by citations
- Cognitive Neuroscience — 16 citations into it; #10,336 of 10,852 by trust here, #7,130 by citations
- Political Science and International Relations — 12 citations into it
- Language and Linguistics — 9 citations into it; #2,171 of 3,093 by trust here, #1,611 by citations
- Literature and Literary Theory — 7 citations into it
Whom Stefania Paolini trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- T. Pettigrew
- Miles Hewstone
- Rhiannon N. Turner
- Rupert Brown
- James T Harwood
- M. Hadjipavlou
- Linda R. Tropp
- R. Crisp
- Andrew F. Hayes
- Walter G. Stephan
Who trusts Stefania Paolini overall
- Miles Hewstone
- Katrín Árnadóttir
- Mathias Kauff
- Emilio Paolo Visintin
- H. Selvanathan
- Fakieh Alrabai
- Simon Lolliot
- Rupert Brown
- R. Crisp
- A. Voci
Papers from Stefania Paolini's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers Stefania Paolini trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Extended contact through story reading in school : Reducing children's prejudice toward the disabled
- Intergroup Contact and Prejudice Toward Immigrants in Italy: The Mediational Role of Anxiety and the Moderational Role of Group Salience
- Negative intergroup contact is more influential, but positive intergroup contact is more common: Assessing contact prominence and contact prevalence in five Central European countries
- Interpersonal Concerns in Social Encounters between Majority and Minority Group Members
- Personalization and the Promise of Contact Theory
- Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model
- Imagining Intergroup Contact Can Improve Intergroup Attitudes
- Valuing Diversity and Interest in Intergroup Contact
- Elaboration enhances the imagined contact effect
- Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test.
Their papers
- Negative intergroup contact is more influential, but positive intergroup contact is more common: Assessing contact prominence and contact prevalence in five Central European countries (2014) — 271 citations
- Positive and extensive intergroup contact in the past buffers against the disproportionate impact of negative contact in the present (2014) — 181 citations
- Reducing prejudice via direct and extended cross-group friendship (2007) — 242 citations
- Intergroup contact and the promotion of intergroup harmony: The influence of intergroup emotions. (2006) — 98 citations
- Seeking and avoiding intergroup contact: Future frontiers of research on building social integration (2018) — 130 citations
- The Effects of Teachers’ Motivational Strategies on Learners’ Motivation: A Controlled Investigation of Second Language Acquisition (2013) — 194 citations
- Intergroup contact research in the 21st century: Lessons learned and forward progress if we remain open (2021) — 89 citations
- How do we get people into contact? Predictors of intergroup contact and drivers of contact seeking (2020) — 94 citations
- A processing fluency explanation of bias against migrants (2010) — 123 citations