Reducing Intergroup Bias: The Common Ingroup Identity Model

By S. Gaertner, John F. Dovidio. 2000

2,045 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/719fd16a7353c0d4297f8dd328d094d3a9c932e1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Improving Intergroup Relations in Higher Education: A Critical Examination of the Influence of Educational Interventions on Racial Bias (2004, background): “Gaertner and Dovidio (2000), for instance, posit that content-based knowledge elicits change in racial bias through the process of decategorization, whereby students break down group Improving Intergroup Relations in Higher Education barriers and conceive of themselves and others as separate…”
Language and Intergroup Contact: Investigating the Impact of Bilingual Instruction on Children’s Intergroup Attitudes (2005, background): “…for Allport’s proposed conditions (see Pettigrew, 1998), a recent resurgence of interest in the contact hypothesis has sparked a number of other advances (Brewer & Brown, 1998; Gaertner & Dovidio, 2000; Hewstone & Brown, 1986; Miller & Brewer, 1984; Pettigrew, 1998; Pettigrew & Tropp, 2000).”
Dropping the weight stigma: nostalgia improves attitudes toward persons who are overweight (2012, background): “Gaertner and Dovidio (2000) proposed that, when members of two groups form a common ingroup identity, changing their cognitive representations from seeing two separate groups (‘Us’ versus ‘Them’) to one inclusive group (‘We’), intergroup bias is reduced or eliminated.”
Recategorization into the In-group (2014, methodology): “…and Brown, 1986) suggests that biases against dissimilar others can be reduced after people work cooperatively with dissimilar others to achieve a common goal and recognize that others’ dissimilar characteristics allow them to make superior contributions (see review by Gaertner and Dovidio, 2000).”
Mangy mutt or furry friend? Anthropomorphism promotes animal welfare (2012, background): “It may also be the case that anthropomorphism leads to subtle inferences about group membership that inform the process of categorizing targets as ingroup or outgroup members and shape subsequent behavior (see Gaertner & Dovidio, 2000).”
Functions of Dysfunction (2014, background): “Although such admonitions did not appear to forestall actual conflict, they reminded members of their superordinate identification with the co-op and provided members with a sort of comfort in the imagined boundaries for the coming strife (Gaertner and Dovidio, 2000).”
Prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination: Theoretical and empirical overview (2010, background): “…and establishing personalized relations (Brewer & Miller, 1984; Miller, 2002; Wilder, 1986), recategorizing groups within a common group identity (Gaertner & Dovidio, 2000), or maintaining distinct group identities but within the context of positive interdependence between groups (Brown &…”
Collective Action as the Material Expression of Opinion‐Based Group Membership (2009, background): “(p. 53) The first of the alternatives raised by Reicher et al. has received considerable attention through work on common in-group identity (e.g., Dovidio et al., 1997; Gaertner & Dovidio, 2000, 2005).”
Cultural Diversity and Team Performance: The Role of Team Member Goal Orientation (2013, background): “Within the literature, cultural diversity is argued to be more positively related to performance when a team’s members have a shared superordinate team identity or when they see themselves as separate individuals (Gaertner & Dovidio, 2000).”
When and why does extended contact work? (2011, unknown): “Therefore, increasing perception of “us” rather than “we” and “them” (Gaertner & Dovidio, 2000).”
Do Workgroup Faultlines Help or Hurt? A Moderated Model of Faultlines, Team Identification, and Group Performance (2009, background): “When members perceive themselves as sharing a common ingroup identity, the chances of subgroup categorization, identification, and associated biases are minimized (Gaertner et al. 1993, Gaertner and Dovidio 2000 ).”
Reducing prejudice via direct and extended cross-group friendship (2007, methodology): “The recategorisation approach (Gaertner & Dovidio, 2000 ) also proposed that group boundaries should be eliminated, but through the inclusion of both groups in a superordinate group.”