Valuing Diversity and Interest in Intergroup Contact

By Linda R. Tropp, Rebecca A. Bianchi. 2006

132 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cbe96299c3bce8f0b124b020a6c920b4b1885867

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

When extended contact opens the door to future contact (2011, background): “In particular, minority expectations for contact often depend more strongly on the extent to which they believe their groups are valued by the outgroup, relative to the effects observed among majority group members (Tropp & Bianchi, 2006).”
Consequences of Diversity for Social Cohesion and Prejudice: The Missing Dimension of Intergroup Contact (2015, background): “In order to approximate norms at the neighborhood level, we measured diversity beliefs, which reflect the extent to which individuals value and endorse diversity (see, e.g., Tropp & Bianchi, 2006).”
From imagery to intention: A dual route model of imagined contact effects (2010, background): “Pettigrew and Tropp's ( 2006 ) meta-analysis of over 500 studies has recently qualified this assertion.”
Implicit Attitudes and Beliefs Adapt to Situations: A Decade of Research on the Malleability of Implicit Prejudice, Stereotypes, and the Self-Concept (2013, background): “One of the best tried and tested methods of prejudice reduction involved motivating people to engage in intergroup contact (Pettigrew & Tropp, 2006; Tropp & Bianchi, 2006; Tropp, Stout, Boatswain, Wright, & Pettigrew, 2006).”
Seeking and avoiding intergroup contact: Future frontiers of research on building social integration (2018, background): “…about intergroup contact “exposing” and challenging their in‐group's privileges (e.g., if group inequalities and power differences are discussed; Tropp & Bianchi, 2006); minority members with polarized intergroup views might avoid contact because they see friendly relationships with the…”
How Peer Norms of Inclusion and Exclusion Predict Children's Interest in Cross‐Ethnic Friendships (2014, background): “Nonetheless, people’s own attitudes toward cross-ethnic relations are often more positive than what they perceive among members of their own groups or other groups (Tropp & Bianchi, 2006).”