L. Mokkink

Statistics and Probability · 2010–2021

A researcher in the Science corpus: 12 papers; trusts 9 researchers and is trusted by 6 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Statistics and Probability — 57 citations into it; #6,040 of 12,932 by trust here, #2,531 by citations
Economics and Econometrics — 48 citations into it
Management Science and Operations Research — 33 citations into it; #8,652 of 11,946 by trust here, #2,728 by citations
Sociology and Political Science — 25 citations into it; #18,874 of 22,756 by trust here, #7,219 by citations
Pharmacology — 14 citations into it
Education — 13 citations into it; #4,481 of 11,309 by trust here, #2,786 by citations
Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 5 citations into it

Whom L. Mokkink trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

Who trusts L. Mokkink overall

Papers from L. Mokkink's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers L. Mokkink trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing. (International Journal of Nursing Studies)
What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
診断精度研究のバイアスリスク評価ツールQUADAS－2：a Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 の活用
Unpublished rating scales: A major source of bias in randomised controlled trials of treatments for schizophrenia (British Journal of Psychiatry)
On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: Guidelines for instrument evaluation (Quality of Life Research)
Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: Consensus on Health Economic Criteria (International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care)
The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
When to use agreement versus reliability measures. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)

Their papers

The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (2010) — 3,767 citations
The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content (2010) — 714 citations
The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. (2010) — 3,940 citations
COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures (2018) — 2,569 citations
COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (2017) — 1,905 citations
Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist (2011) — 1,810 citations
COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (2021) — 682 citations
COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study (2020) — 451 citations
COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study (2018) — 1,746 citations
The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument (2016) — 756 citations
Measurement in Medicine: Index (2011) — 824 citations
Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide (2011) — 1,943 citations