Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide

1,943 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (2017, result): “1 3 between groups [12], and compare the results found in the included studies to the hypotheses formulated by the review team.”
The grounded psychometric development and initial validation of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) (2013, background): “Traditional approaches to the development of measures of complex multi-dimensional phenomena include undertaking literature reviews, reviews of items and scales in previously developed measures, and undertaking qualitative interviews with the target population to define the constructs within a prede”
Is Construct Validation Valid? (2016, methodology): “Validation of these scales follows a typical pattern described in measurement textbooks and articles on validation (Simms 2008; de Vet et al. 2011).”
COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study (2020, background): “where σy represents the standard deviation (SD) of the sample [26].”