Paula R. Williamson
Sociology and Political Science · 2004–2020
A researcher in the Science corpus: 12 papers; trusts 3 researchers and is trusted by 12 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Sociology and Political Science — 19 citations into it; #7,716 of 22,756 by trust here, #1,631 by citations
Whom Paula R. Williamson trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- Ian P. Sinha
- Douglas G. Altman
- L. Mokkink
- L. Koziol
- R. Smyth
- I. Chalmers
- Alicia O'Cathain
- A. Chan
- David Moher
- C. Terwee
Who trusts Paula R. Williamson overall
Papers from Paula R. Williamson's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers Paula R. Williamson trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (PLoS ONE)
- CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (British medical journal)
- Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (PLoS Medicine)
- Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up? (PLoS Medicine)
- Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. (The Lancet)
- The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews (British medical journal)
- GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
- Developing core outcome measurement sets for clinical trials: OMERACT filter 2.0. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
- The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (Quality of Life Research)
- Core outcome measures for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (Pain)
Their papers
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008) — 1,504 citations
- The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews (2010) — 1,008 citations
- Using the Delphi Technique to Determine Which Outcomes to Measure in Clinical Trials: Recommendations for the Future Based on a Systematic Review of Existing Studies (2011) — 809 citations
- Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. (2004) — 2,493 citations
- How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline (2016) — 936 citations
- Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012) — 1,488 citations
- The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017) — 1,669 citations
- A minimal common outcome measure set for COVID-19 clinical research (2020) — 1,467 citations
- Core Outcome Set-STAndards for Development: The COS-STAD recommendations (2017) — 626 citations
- Adverse Drug Reactions in Hospital In-Patients: A Prospective Analysis of 3695 Patient-Episodes (2009) — 678 citations
- The SANAD study of effectiveness of carbamazepine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, or topiramate for treatment of partial epilepsy: an unblinded randomised controlled trial (2007) — 865 citations
- The SANAD study of effectiveness of valproate, lamotrigine, or topiramate for generalised and unclassifiable epilepsy: an unblinded randomised controlled trial (2007) — 890 citations