Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires.

By C. Terwee, S. Bot, M. R. de Boer, D. A. van der Windt, Dirk L. Knol, J. Dekker, Lex M. Bouter, HC de Vet. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2007

9,788 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Management Science and Operations Research, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a7f6dc8dcae663de3d2bf86e3f77a3b0518ec314

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. C. Terwee
2. L. Mokkink
3. C. Prinsen
4. Jordi Alonso
5. HC de Vet
6. Lex M. Bouter
7. D.walaa badawy
8. L. Liebenberg

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. C. Terwee
2. L. Mokkink
3. Lex M. Bouter
4. HC de Vet
5. Jordi Alonso
6. C. Prinsen
7. B. Reeve
8. D.walaa badawy

In Statistics and Probability

1. L. Mokkink
2. C. Terwee
3. C. Prinsen
4. HC de Vet
5. Lex M. Bouter
6. Jordi Alonso
7. D.walaa badawy
8. Dirk L. Knol

Citations in the corpus

• Validation of the Child and Youth Resilience Measure-28 (CYRM-28) Among Canadian Youth (2012, background): “Cutoff scores, convergent validity, and predictive validity would also still need to be established (Terwee et al., 2007).”
• What is compassion and how can we measure it? A review of definitions and measures. (2016, background): “Under this criterion, Terwee et al. (2007) also emphasize the importance of both members of the target population and experts being involved in item development.”
• How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline (2016, neutral): “…distinctive parts: (1) evaluation of the methodological quality of the included studies by using the COSMIN checklist [6] and (2) evaluation of the quality of the OMIs (i.e., their measurement properties and feasibility aspects) by applying criteria for good measurement properties (Table 2) [19].”
• Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. (2011, neutral): “80 are often used as the minimum standards for reliability coefficients, but this may be only sufficient for group-level comparisons or research purposes [12,58,108].”
• Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist (2011, methodology): “Other checklists that have been published, such as EMPRO [17], and a checklist we previously designed [18] were developed for rating the quality of an instrument rather than the methodological quality of a study.”
• A methodological review of resilience measurement scales (2011, methodology): “Fundamental to the robustness of a methodological review are the quality criteria used to distinguish the measurement properties of a scale to enable a meaningful comparison [15].”
• COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study (2018, methodology): “The new COSMIN standards and criteria for content validity are not substantially different from earlier published guidelines, including the original COSMIN standards for content validity, but they are more detailed, standardized, and transparent [3, 20, 21, 23, 24, 37].”
• A review of key issues in the measurement of children’s social and emotional skills (2010, background): “For instance, Warwick and Nettleback (2004) found that S&ES correlated with certain personality variables when measured by the Trait MetaMood Scale (TMMS), a typical behaviour measure (Salovey, Mayer, Goldman, Turvey & Palfai, 1995), but not when measured by the MSCEIT, a maximal behaviour measure (”
• The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (2010, background): “Examples of such criteria were previously published by members of our group [6].”
• ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research (2013, background): “, patient-reported or clinical indicators) in a manner that is consistent with theoretically derived a priori hypotheses concerning the concepts that are being measured [40]”
• A primary care back pain screening tool: identifying patient subgroups for initial treatment. (2008, methodology): “Sample size calculations were based on previous survey responses in similar patient populations; an initial sample of 200 patients was identified to provide sufficient responses to evaluate validity based on a minimal 10:1 ratio of patients to variables (29).”
• Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity. (2017, background): “Atualmente, um número crescente de questionários ou instrumentos de medida que avaliam características psicossociais e diversos desfechos em saúde está disponível para uso em pesquisas, na prática clínica e na avaliação de saúde da população.(1) Apesar da criação de novos instrumentos, muitos não tê”
• Development of the Digital Health Literacy Instrument: Measuring a Broad Spectrum of Health 1.0 and Health 2.0 Skills (2017, background): “We considered floor or ceiling effects to be present if >15% of the participants scored the worst or the best possible score on the subscales [39].”