Julie May Glanville
Statistics and Probability · 2004–2021
A researcher in the Science corpus: 9 papers; trusts 3 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Statistics and Probability — 193 citations into it
- Economics and Econometrics — 54 citations into it
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health — 28 citations into it
Whom Julie May Glanville trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
Who trusts Julie May Glanville overall
Papers from Julie May Glanville's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers Julie May Glanville trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (British medical journal)
- Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review (Systematic Reviews)
- PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (British medical journal)
- PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (Annals of Internal Medicine)
- Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ (BMC Medical Research Methodology)
- PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews (Journal of the Medical Library Association)
- Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (Nature)
- Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline (British medical journal)
- Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
- Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PLoS ONE)
Their papers
- PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020) — 10,812 citations
- The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2020) — 94,440 citations
- The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. (2021) — 3,176 citations
- PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews (2021) — 1,591 citations
- The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021) — 25,061 citations
- Understanding factors affecting patient and public engagement and recruitment to digital health interventions: a systematic review of qualitative studies (2016) — 570 citations
- Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making. (2010) — 619 citations
- How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on. (2006) — 637 citations
- Review of guidelines for good practice in decision-analytic modelling in health technology assessment. (2004) — 726 citations