Victoria Pennick

Statistics and Probability · 2009

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 2 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Victoria Pennick trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Julian P. T. Higgins
  2. Julie May Glanville

Who trusts Victoria Pennick overall

  1. Mieke Heyvaert

Papers from Victoria Pennick's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Victoria Pennick trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. How to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE: ten years on. (Journal of the Medical Library Association)
  2. Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis. (British medical journal)
  3. Interpreting Change Scores for Pain and Functional Status in Low Back Pain: Towards International Consensus Regarding Minimal Important Change (Spine)
  4. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations (British medical journal)
  5. Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science (Biomedical Digital Libraries)
  6. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (International Coaching Psychology Review)
  7. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (Annals of Internal Medicine)
  8. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
  9. C-reactive protein and other markers of inflammation in the prediction of cardiovascular disease in women. (New England Journal of Medicine)
  10. How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS

Their papers