E. Hebets

Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics · 2000–2011

A researcher in the Science corpus: 9 papers; trusts 32 researchers and is trusted by 30 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom E. Hebets trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. G. Uetz
  2. U. Candolin
  3. S. Norton
  4. G. Stratton
  5. Fredrik Ronquist
  6. C. Vink
  7. Masami Hasegawa
  8. J. Kotiaho
  9. A. Hedrick
  10. J. Reynolds

Who trusts E. Hebets overall

  1. G. Uetz
  2. Dustin J. Wilgers
  3. S. Partan
  4. J. H. Hunt
  5. D. Elias
  6. Jeremy S. Gibson
  7. Kelly L. Ronald
  8. Anne S. Leonard
  9. J. Roberts
  10. G. Patricelli

Papers from E. Hebets's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers E. Hebets trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. The use of multiple cues in mate choice (Biological Reviews of The Cambridge Philosophical Society)
  2. Testing the assumptions of conditional handicap theory: costs and condition dependence of a sexually selected trait (Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology)
  3. MATING FREQUENCY IN SCHIZOCOSA OCREATA (HENTZ) WOLF SPIDERS: EVIDENCE FOR A MATING SYSTEM WITH FEMALE MONANDRY AND MALE POLYGYNY
  4. INFLUENCE OF FEEDING REGIME ON BODY SIZE, BODY CONDITION AND A MALE SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTER IN SCHIZOCOSA OCREATA WOLF SPIDERS (ARANEAE, LYCOSIDAE): CONDITION-DEPENDENCE IN A VISUAL SIGNALING TRAIT
  5. The importance of olfactory signals in the gasterosteid mating system: sticklebacks go multimodal
  6. Preference for male traits in female wolf spiders varies with the choice of available males, female age and reproductive state (Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology)
  7. Speciation through sensory drive in cichlid fish (Nature)
  8. Experience Affects Female Responses to Male Song in the Variable Field Cricket Gryllus lineaticeps (Orthoptera, Gryllidae)
  9. Issues in the Classification of Multimodal Communication Signals (American Naturalist)
  10. Response to Eberhard and Cordero, and Córdoba-Aguilar and Contreras-Garduño: sexual conflict and female choice

Their papers