Issues in the Classification of Multimodal Communication Signals

By S. Partan, P. Marler. American Naturalist, 2005

584 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental Biology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Food Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c5a7cdd9b592e8ffacdbd9622eaaf78b493bb493

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental Biology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Food Science

Citations in the corpus

Sexual selection in the squirrel treefrog Hyla squirella: the role of multimodal cue assessment in female choice (2007, background): “In nonredundant signals, one component may modulate the receiver response to the other component (Partan & Marler 1999, 2005).”
Prosocial signaling and cooperation among Martu hunters (2015, background): “Because prosocial intent is such a difficult thing to convey, it requires a multimodal signal (Higham & Hebets, 2013; Partan & Marler, 1999, 2005).”
Forget-me-not: Complex floral displays, inter-signal interactions, and pollinator cognition (2011, background): “However, since their perspectives are either somewhat more phenomenological or strategic (e.g., Partan and Marler, 2005; Candolin, 2003; see also Leonard and Hedrick, 2010), we follow the structure of Hebets and Papaj (2005), in which hypotheses are grouped according to whether LEONARD AS: Flowers…”
Seismic communication and mate choice in wolf spiders: components of male seismic signals and mating success (2008, background): “Signal components in multimodal displays may communicate redundant or entirely different types of information (see reviews by Møller & Pomiankowski 1993; Johnstone 1995; Candolin 2003; Hebets & Papaj 2005; Partan & Marler 2005).”
Wild tree squirrels respond with multisensory enhancement to conspecific robot alarm behaviour. (2009, unknown): “Because the response metric can affect interpretation of the data, in particular influencing the classification of a signal into redundant and nonredundant categories (Partan & Marler 2005), we also examined the behavioural responses individually.”
Female preference for male color is necessary and sufficient for assortative mating in 2 cichlid sister species (2014, background): “Mate choice frequently involves multiple cues across multiple sensory modalities (Partan and Marler 1999, 2005; Candolin 2003; Hebets and Papaj 2005; Chenoweth and Blows 2006; Hohenlohe and Arnold 2010; Hebets 2011).”
Consequences of complex signaling: predator detection of multimodal cues (2007, background): “Complex signals are thought to enhance efficacy by enabling signals to reliably exceed detection thresholds, increasing the probability of detection, and lowering the reaction latency of intended receivers (Rowe 1999; Candolin 2003; Hebets and Papaj 2005; Partan and Marler 2005).”
Orchestrating the score: complex multimodal courtship in the Habronattus coecatus group of Habronattus jumping spiders (Araneae: Salticidae) (2012, background): “…Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2012, 105, 522–547522 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/biolinnean/article-abstract/105/3/522/2452647 by guest on 29 July 2018 reception (Guilford & Dawkins, 1993; Rowe, 1999; Hebets & Papaj, 2005; Partan & Marler, 2005).”
Multimodal communication and mate choice in wolf spiders: female response to multimodal versus unimodal signals (2009, methodology): “Recent reviews of multimodal communication have proposed similar classification schemes and hypotheses ( Partan & Marler 1999, 2005; Partan 2004; Hebets & Papaj 2005).”
Complex courtship displays facilitate male reproductive success and plasticity in signaling across variable environments (2011, background): “…selection may lead to the evolution of complex signaling incorporating redundant information across signal components, (Møller and Pomiankowski, 1993; Johnstone, 1995), enabling both accurate and consistent female assessment regardless of the environment (Candolin, 2003; Partan and Marler, 2005).”
Female preference for complex/novel signals in a spider (2006, background): “Different male signals may be under different selective pressures and may interact in complex nonadditive ways leading to complex patterns in mating preferences (Pomiankowski and Iwasa 1993, 1998; Iwasa and Pomiankowski 1994; Partan and Marler 1999, 2005; Rowe 1999; Candolin 2003; Hebets 2005; Heb”
BIRD ODORS AND OTHER CHEMICAL SUBSTANCES: A DEFENSE MECHANISM OR OVERLOOKED MODE OF INTRASPECIFIC COMMUNICATION? (2007, background): “A bird’s response may require or interact with other kinds of sensory input, such as displays, visual ornaments, and vocalizations (see Partan and Marler 2005).”
Faux frogs : multimodal signalling and the value of robotics in animal behaviour (2008, background): “For example, the signal components may be redundant, conveying the same information, or nonredundant, conveying different information (Johnstone 1996; Martins et al. 2005; Partan & Marler 2005 ).”
Facial Expression in Nonhuman Animals (2013, background): “Without extremely detailed video analysis, it is difficult to differentiate between articulatory gestures necessary to produce the accompanying vocalisation, and the mouth movements that are part of a ritualised display (Partan & Marler, 2005).”
Taking the sensory approach: how individual differences in sensory perception can influence mate choice (2012, unknown): “…research often focuses on signal content (Hebets 2011), classifying the role of different sensory modes based on whether they convey the same (redundant signalling) or complementary (nonredundant signalling) information about the sender (Møller & Pomiankowski 1993; Partan & Marler 1999, 2005).”
Multisensory perception in uncertain environments (2012, unknown): “Throughout our analysis, we use terms from the framework of Partan and Marler (1999, 2005) to describe perception of multimodal stimuli (Figure 1).”