INFLUENCE OF FEEDING REGIME ON BODY SIZE, BODY CONDITION AND A MALE SECONDARY SEXUAL CHARACTER IN SCHIZOCOSA OCREATA WOLF SPIDERS (ARANEAE, LYCOSIDAE): CONDITION-DEPENDENCE IN A VISUAL SIGNALING TRAIT

By G. Uetz, R. Papke, B. Kilinc. 2002

132 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract Male Schizocosa ocreata (Hentz) wolf spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae) have tufts of elongated, dark bristles on the patella and tibia of the forelegs, which are involved in visual signaling. Previous research has suggested that these tufts are used by females as a criterion in mate choice, raising the question of whether they might serve as indicators of male condition. We tested the hypothesis that tufts are condition-dependent indicator traits with a laboratory rearing study subjecting spiders to lifelong feeding regimens representing successful (high food) and unsuccessful (low food) foraging history, after which males were measured upon reaching adulthood. Mortality varied significantly with experimental treatment, and had a disproportionate impact on some egg sacs assigned to the low food treatment. Age at sexual maturity and several body size measures varied significantly with feeding history. Well-fed spiders survived better, matured earlier, were significantly larger, and were in relatively better condition (measured as a residual body condition index) than deprived spiders. Additionally, well-fed spiders had significantly larger relative tuft size (scaled for body size). These data suggest that male body size, condition and a conspicuous male signaling trait vary with feeding history, and thus have the potential to serve as “honest indicators” of male quality in mate choice.

Subfields: Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/569641fa122f4ba5261ab5187faefeef625f1526

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience

  1. E. Hebets
  2. Dustin J. Wilgers
  3. Jeremy S. Gibson
  4. P. Shamble
  5. J. Roberts
  6. G. Uetz
  7. Jennifer Wesson

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

  1. E. Hebets
  2. G. Uetz
  3. Dustin J. Wilgers
  4. Jeremy S. Gibson
  5. J. Roberts
  6. P. Shamble
  7. Jennifer Wesson
  8. S. Norton

In Genetics

  1. E. Hebets
  2. G. Uetz
  3. Dustin J. Wilgers
  4. Jeremy S. Gibson
  5. J. Roberts
  6. P. Shamble
  7. Jennifer Wesson
  8. S. Norton

Citations in the corpus