Complex courtship displays facilitate male reproductive success and plasticity in signaling across variable environments
By Dustin J. Wilgers, E. Hebets. 2011
88 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Effective signal transmission is essential for communication. In environments where signal transmission is highly variable, signalers may utilize complex signals, which incorporate multiple components and modalities, to maintain effective communication. Male Rabidosa rabida wolf spiders produce complex courtship signals, consisting of both visual and seismic components. We test the hypothesis that the complex signaling of R. rabida contributes to male reproductive success in variable signaling environments. We first examine the condition-dependence of foreleg ornamentation (a presumed visual signal) and seismic signal components and find that both may provide potentially redundant information on foraging history. Next, we as- sessed reproductive success across manipulated signaling environments that varied in the effectiveness of visual and/or seismic signal transmission. In environments where only one signal could be successfully transmitted (e.g., visual or seismic), pairs were still able to successfully copulate. Additionally, we found that males altered their courtship display depending on the current signaling environment. Specifically, males reduced their use of a visual display component in signaling environments where visual signal transmission was ablated. Incorporating signals in multiple modalities not only enables R. rabida males to maintain copulation success across variable signaling environments, but it also enables males to adjust their composite courtship display to current signaling conditions (Current Zoology 57 (2): 175-186, 2011).
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a07f33fd928ecd1c2589de0b8abaf3ad4e84e7ae
Citations in the corpus
- Taking the sensory approach: how individual differences in sensory perception can influence mate choice (2012, unknown): “…redundant multimodal signals may be more common than nonredundant multimodal signals (Partan & Marler 2005; MacDougall-Shackleton et al. 2009; Alonso et al. 2010; Elias et al. 2010; Wilgers & Hebets 2011); therefore, our predictions should be applicable across many multimodal mate choice contexts.”