Experience leads to preference: experienced females prefer brush-legged males in a population of syntopic wolf spiders
97 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/215252ac0fd391d4b483f0aad4d33859093364de
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- E. Hebets
- G. Uetz
- J. Roberts
- P. Shamble
- Phillip W. Taylor
- Jennifer Wesson
- S. Adamowicz
- Paul D. N. Hebert
In Genetics
- E. Hebets
- G. Uetz
- J. Roberts
- P. Shamble
- Jennifer Wesson
- Phillip W. Taylor
- S. Adamowicz
- Paul D. N. Hebert
Citations in the corpus
- Diet influences mate choice selectivity in adult female wolf spiders (2008, background): “…and Moore, 2001; Coleman et al., 2004; Uetz and Norton, 2007), female experience (Collins, 1995; Kodric-Brown and Nicoletto, 2001; Hebets, 2003; Hebets and Vink, 2007), female self-perception (Little et al., 2001; Burley and Foster, 2006; Little and Mannion, 2006), and female–male…”
- Prospects for using DNA barcoding to identify spiders in species-rich genera (2009, background): “…used to explain the lack of genetic divergence between Latrodectus variegates / L. mirabilis (Garb et al. 2004), while incomplete lineage sorting and hybridization were proposed for Schizocosa ocreata / S. rovneri and Latrodectus corallinus / L. diaguita (Hebets and Vink 2007; Garb et al. 2004).”
- Multimodal communication and mate choice in wolf spiders: female response to multimodal versus unimodal signals (2009, background): “While seismic signalling is plesiomorphic in the genus (see below), S. rovneri may have secondarily lost reliance on visual displays and multimodal courtship signalling for mate choice (Stratton 2005; Hebets & Vink 2007 ).”
- The evolution and evolutionary consequences of social plasticity in mate preferences (2013, unknown): “…hypothesis, including studies in crickets (Bateman et al. 2001; Wagner et al. 2001; Bailey & Zuk 2008, 2009; Rebar et al. 2011), fruit flies (O’Hara et al. 1976; Dukas 2006), sticklebacks (Kozak & Boughman 2009), treehoppers (Fowler-Finn & Rodríguez 2012a, b) and wolf spiders (Hebets & Vink 2007).”