Response to Eberhard and Cordero, and Córdoba-Aguilar and Contreras-Garduño: sexual conflict and female choice

By T. Chapman, G. Arnqvist, J. Bangham, L. Rowe. 2003

489 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, General Health Professions

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/94e055eb93fbd13432d190373f0b749a07df56da

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In General Health Professions

Citations in the corpus

The effects of male and female genotype on variance in male fertilization success in the red flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum) (2003, background): “However, as pointed out by Brown and Eady ( 2001) and Chapman et al. (2003), these seemingly contrasting predictions should be applied with caution, as their relevance will depend on the absolute magnitude of divergence between populations or genotypes (see also Price 1997; Howard 1999; Gavrilets…”
Genetic similarity of social mates predicts the level of extrapair paternity in splendid fairy-wrens (2005, background): “Under this hypothesis females could use extrapair matings to avoid close inbreeding with genetically similar social mates, but would not be expected to seek highly dissimilar extrapair mates (e.g. Tregenza & Wedell 2000, 2002; cf. Chapman et al. 2003).”
Why do male Callosobruchus maculatus harm their mates (2005, background): “Avoidance of male-imposed costs of mating has been suggested to be an important driving force behind the evolution of female traits in a number of species (see Chapman et al., 2003).”
The effects of copulation duration in the bruchid beetle Callosobruchus maculatus (2006, background): “[Behav Ecol 17:430–434 (2006)] Conflicting evolutionary interests of individual males andfemales appear to be a common and important driving force behind the evolution of traits involved in reproduction (Chapman et al., 2003; Parker, 1979; Partridge and Hurst, 1998).”
The scent of dominance: female field crickets use odour to predict the outcome of male competition (2005, background): “This has been interpreted as an example of evolutionary conflict between the sexes (Moore et al. 2001; Chapman et al. 2003).”
Mating Strategies in Relation to Sexually Selected Infanticide in a Non‐Social Carnivore: the Brown Bear (2006, background): “This study illustrates male–female conflict in reproductive strategies (Chapman et al. 2003).”
Sexual harassment in live-bearing fishes (Poeciliidae): comparing courting and noncourting species (2007, background): “Sexual conflict between the sexes may arise due to opposed interests regarding quantity and quality of mates (Parker 1979; Smuts BB and Smuts RW 1993; Rowe et al. 1994; Parker and Partridge 1998; Chapman et al. 2003; Pizzari and Snook 2003; Arnqvist and Rowe 2005).”
Sexual Conflict, Ecology, and Breeding Systems in Shorebirds (2006, methodology): “Our experiments with the Kentish plover and the predictions of the game-theoretic model indicate that an evolutionary tug-of-war exists between males and females over care, consistent with sexual conflict theory (Chapman et al. 2003, Arnqvist and Rowe 2005).”
Sex and social networking: the influence of male presence on social structure of female shark groups (2010, background): “In such societies, this can lead to differences in behavioral strategies between the sexes whereby males, who energetically invest little by way of gamete production and parental care, gain substantially greater genetic reward from mating events than females (Chapman et al. 2003).”
Speciation and Sexual Conflict (2005, background): “…in particular, and what is its place in relationship to different theories of sexual selection remain very controversial topics (e.g., Getty, 1999; Rosenthal and Servedio, 1999; Chapman et al., 2003; Córdoba-Aguilar and Contreras-Garduno, 2003; Eberhard and Cordero, 2003; Pizzari and Snook, 2003).”
Female preference for complex/novel signals in a spider (2006, background): “…(i.e., signaling and receiving costs, measurements of male quality, and mating costs) can be informative in assessing different models of sexual selection (Ryan 1990; Andersson 1994; Endler and Basolo 1998; Holland and Rice 1998; Chapman et al. 2003; Hebets and Maddison 2005; Rowe et al. 2005).”
Sperm competition in Odonata (Insecta): the evolution of female sperm storage and rivals' sperm displacement (2003, background): “Recent studies in two species of insects have provided strong evidence that both sexes are co-evolving, for which it has been implied that females may suffer a fitness cost of mating (reviewed by Chapman et al., 2003).”
Male signaling behavior and sexual selection in a wolf spider (Araneae: Lycosidae): a test for dual functions (2007, result): “…direction on the same set of traits (e.g., ornaments) is currently under some debate (Berglund et al. 1996; Wiley and Poston 1996; Candolin 1999; Chapman et al. 2003; Persons and Uetz 2005), our results and those of Candolin 2005 suggest that different traits (e.g., size, behavior) may function…”