David V. Budescu
Statistics and Probability · 2001–2015
A researcher in the Science corpus: 12 papers; trusts 23 researchers and is trusted by 41 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Statistics and Probability — 18 citations into it; #1,277 of 12,932 by trust here, #1,432 by citations
- Sociology and Political Science — 14 citations into it; #8,362 of 22,756 by trust here, #7,985 by citations
- Management Science and Operations Research — 12 citations into it; #7,474 of 11,946 by trust here, #4,921 by citations
- General Decision Sciences — 9 citations into it; #1,210 of 1,995 by trust here, #997 by citations
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law — 9 citations into it; #1,755 of 2,821 by trust here, #1,407 by citations
- Artificial Intelligence — 6 citations into it
- Applied Psychology — 5 citations into it; #2,941 of 3,868 by trust here, #3,252 by citations
- Economics and Econometrics — 5 citations into it; #14,969 of 23,481 by trust here, #16,151 by citations
Whom David V. Budescu trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- R. Azen
- Richard B. Darlington
- David Freedman
- Y. Heath
- Richard P. Larrick
- Wolfgang Karl Härdle
- Bradley Efron
- Jeff W. Johnson
- John Fox
- Robyn M. Dawes
Who trusts David V. Budescu overall
- Ulrike Grömping
- Scott Tonidandel
- James M. LeBreton
- Kim F. Nimon
- Jeff W. Johnson
- Elke U. Weber
- R. Azen
- H. Schielzeth
- Xiaoqian Wang
- Aaron Fisher
Papers from David V. Budescu's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers David V. Budescu trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Multiple regression in psychological research and practice.
- The case for motivated reasoning.
- Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife
- Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality.
- Bootstrapping Regression Models
- Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle
- A Heuristic Method for Estimating the Relative Weight of Predictor Variables in Multiple Regression (Multivariate Behavioral Research)
- Which Dominates? The Relative Importance of Work–Family Organizational Support and General Organizational Context on Employee Outcomes
- Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis
- Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife
Their papers
- The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression. (2003) — 967 citations
- Identifying Expertise to Extract the Wisdom of Crowds (2015) — 344 citations
- Averaging probability judgments: Monte Carlo analyses of asymptotic diagnostic value (2001) — 74 citations
- Effective communication of uncertainty in the IPCC reports (2012) — 220 citations
- Comparing Predictors in Multivariate Regression Models: An Extension of Dominance Analysis (2006) — 155 citations
- Criticality of predictors in multiple regression. (2001) — 45 citations
- Personal experience with climate change predicts intentions to act (2015) — 176 citations
- Beyond Global Measures of Relative Importance: Some Insights from Dominance Analysis (2004) — 129 citations
- The same but different: an empirical investigation of the reducibility principle (2001) — 53 citations
- Why recognition is rational: Optimality results on single-variable decision rules (2010) — 54 citations
- Why Are Experts Correlated? Decomposing Correlations Between Judges (2009) — 55 citations
- Predicting the directionality of probability words from their membership functions (2003) — 89 citations