Frederick L. Smyth

Sociology and Political Science · 2007–2011

A researcher in the Science corpus: 3 papers; trusts 9 researchers and is trusted by 7 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Sociology and Political Science — 59 citations into it; #8,292 of 22,756 by trust here, #1,484 by citations
• Social Psychology — 44 citations into it; #12,185 of 15,694 by trust here, #3,256 by citations
• Applied Psychology — 16 citations into it
• Cognitive Science & Psychology — 14 citations into it; #488 of 582 by trust here, #105 by citations
• Gender Studies — 13 citations into it
• Management Science and Operations Research — 6 citations into it
• Statistics and Probability — 6 citations into it

Whom Frederick L. Smyth trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. A. Greenwald
2. Brian A. Nosek
3. Mahzarin R. Banaji
4. Bertram Gawronski
5. John T. Jost
6. A. Baron
7. Galen Bodenhausen
8. Timothy D. Wilson
9. F. Strack
10. Debbie E. McGhee

Who trusts Frederick L. Smyth overall

1. Brian A. Nosek
2. Tessa E. S. Charlesworth
3. Efrén O. Pérez
4. Anna Dreber
5. Christine R. Starr
6. David I Miller
7. John T. Jost
8. Ursula Kessels
9. Mahzarin R. Banaji
10. Brian K. Payne

Papers from Frederick L. Smyth's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Frederick L. Smyth trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. (Psychology Review)
2. The psychology of interpersonal relations
3. Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me.
4. A Meta-Analysis on the Correlation Between the Implicit Association Test and Explicit Self-Report Measures (Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin)
5. Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test.
6. Understanding and Using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method Variables and Construct Validity (Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin)
7. Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: an integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. (Psychological bulletin)
8. Gender Similarities Characterize Math Performance (Science)
9. G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences (Behavior Research Methods)
10. Culture, Gender, and Math (Science)

Their papers

• Pervasiveness and correlates of implicit attitudes and stereotypes (2007) — 1,130 citations
• National differences in gender–science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement (2009) — 1,041 citations
• Implicit Social Cognitions Predict Sex Differences in Math Engagement and Achievement (2011) — 250 citations