Peter Sainsbury
International Journal for Quality in Health Care · 2007
A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 1 researcher and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Whom Peter Sainsbury trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
Papers from Peter Sainsbury's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers Peter Sainsbury trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Users' guides to the medical literature: XXIII. Qualitative research in health care A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. (Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA))
- Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation. (Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA))
- Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review. (Social Science & Medicine (1967))
- Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (Medical Journal of Australia)
- Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. (The Lancet)
- The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
- The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (Annals of Internal Medicine)
- Statistical considerations in the intent-to-treat principle. (Controlled Clinical Trials)
- Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. (New England Journal of Medicine)
- Comparison of Weight-Loss Diets with Different Compositions of Fat, Protein, and Carbohydrates (New England Journal of Medicine)