Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.
By Allison Tong, Peter Sainsbury, Jonathan C. Craig. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 2007
6,460 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/bf15d535300a4d711720bce1f614f6df6cf12c56
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
In Statistics and Probability
Citations in the corpus
- A Mixed-Method Review of Cash Transfers and Intimate Partner Violence in Low- and Middle-Income Countries (2018, positive): “For qualitative studies, we used the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) checklist (Tong, Sainsbury, and Craig 2007).”
- Reporting guidelines for health care simulation research: extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE statements (2016, neutral): “Other reporting guidelines that might be amenable for simulation-specific extensions include the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research [57], and the Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence [58] guidelines for reporting quality improvement studies.”
- Prediction (2019, neutral): “Several sample points are required to train the model; however, the contribution of different sample points to the final result is different.”
- Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research: A Synthesis of Recommendations (2014, neutral): “Several authors suggest standards for reporting qualitative research, 15,20,29–33 but their articles focus on a subset of qualitative data collection methods (e.g., interviews), fail to explain how the authors developed the reporting criteria, narrowly construe qualitative research (e.g., thematic…”
- Optimising the value of the critical appraisal skills programme (CASP) tool for quality appraisal in qualitative evidence synthesis (2020, neutral): “There have been recent calls for improved reporting of qualitative research.(49) In response, qualitative study reporting standards have been developed, such as APA JARS (for qualitative psychology research),(45) Consolidated criteria for Reporting Qualitative research (COREQ; for qualitative interv”
- Feedback from research participants: are member checks useful in qualitative research? (2017, neutral): “…Koelsch 2013; Lincoln & Guba 1985; Tracy 2010) ● Member validation (Bloor 1997; Koelsch 2013) ● Respondent validation (Barbour 2001; Mays & Pope 2000; Tong et al. 2007) ● Member reflections (Tracy 2010) ● Interviewee transcript review (Hagens, Dobrow & Chafe 2009) ● Participant feedback (Curry,…”
- Garbage in, garbage out?: do machine learning application papers in social computing report where human-labeled training data comes from? (2019, neutral): “Such research guidelines are common, including the COREQ standard for qualitative data analysis reporting [63], a requirement by some journals.”
- Impact of HIV-related stigma on treatment adherence: systematic review and meta-synthesis (2013, neutral): “[41].”
- Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ (2012, neutral): “Several appraisal tools have been used including the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) [37] which addresses the principles and assumptions underpinning qualitative research but does not claim to be a definitive guide; the Qualitative Assessment Review Instrument Tool (QARI) [38], which sugges”
- Real-Time Type 1 Diabetes Self-Management Decision-Making in Adolescents: Protocol for a Longitudinal Mixed Methods Study Using Text Messaging and Continuous Glucose Monitoring (2026, neutral): “We will refer to COREQ (Consolida-JMIR ted Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research) guidelines Checklist 1to ensure rigor and transparency in reporting [61].”