Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation.

By David Moher, Alison Jones, L. Lepage. Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), 2001

1,088 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The use of propensity score methods with survival or time-to-event outcomes: reporting measures of effect similar to those used in randomized experiments (2013, methodology): “Just as the CONSORT statement has improved the reporting of RCTs [11], our objective was to describe methods to improve the conduct and reporting of studies that use propensity score methods to estimate the effect of treatment on time-to-event outcomes using observational data.”
Reporting guidelines for Human Microbiome Research: the STORMS checklist (2021, methodology): “Discussion The STORMS checklist for reporting on human microbiome studies was developed with the following priorities: the checklist should (1) be easy to understand and use by researchers from various fields, through straightforward use of language and pruning of items rarely relevant to the curren”
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. (2007, positive): “Empiric studies have shown that the use of the CONSORT statement is associated with improvements in the quality of reports of randomized controlled trials [5].”