Theo Stijnen

Statistics and Probability · 2002–2010

A researcher in the Science corpus: 9 papers; trusts 10 researchers and is trusted by 18 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Theo Stijnen trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Guobing Lu
  2. H. V. van Houwelingen
  3. A. Sutton
  4. A. Ades
  5. Paul C. Lambert
  6. L. Arends
  7. James M. Robins
  8. R. Dersimonian
  9. R. Harbord
  10. J. Pinheiro

Who trusts Theo Stijnen overall

  1. Ian R. White
  2. S. van Buuren
  3. W. Viechtbauer
  4. Dan Jackson
  5. Karel G. M. Moons
  6. T. Debray
  7. R. Riley
  8. A. Veroniki
  9. Rolf H. H. Groenwold
  10. J. Barrett

Papers from Theo Stijnen's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Theo Stijnen trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data. (Statistics in Medicine)
  2. Advanced methods in meta‐analysis: multivariate approach and meta‐regression (Statistics in Medicine)
  3. Linear Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data (Technometrics)
  4. Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-Plus
  5. How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS
  6. The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data (Technometrics)
  7. Inference for imputation estimators
  8. Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update. (Contemporary Clinical Trials)
  9. Publication bias in meta-analysis: Prevention, assessment and adjustments (Psychometrika)
  10. Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta‐analytical methods with rare events (Statistics in Medicine)

Their papers