SPECIAL SERIES: MISSING DATA Review: A gentle introduction to imputation of missing values
By A. Rogier, T. Donders, Theo Stijnen. 2006
2,564 citations recorded by the source corpus.
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Gary S. Collins
- Douglas G. Altman
- Patrick Royston
- Y. Vergouwe
- Willi Sauerbrei
- Joris A. H. de Groot
- Lisa M. McShane
- Karel G. M. Moons
Citations in the corpus
- AutoScore: A Machine Learning–Based Automatic Clinical Score Generator and Its Application to Mortality Prediction Using Electronic Health Records (2020, methodology): “This missing-indicator method has the appealing property that all available information can be used in the analyses [38].”
- A review of the application of machine learning in water quality evaluation (2022, methodology): “Data cleaning can be handled in different ways, including not using the set of data directly, using averages or medians, or using a combination of machine learning and matrix completion methods to supplement the raw data [35].”
- A survey on missing data in machine learning (2021, methodology): “The non-missing values data set is normally used to predict the values used to replace the missing values [8].”
- The proportion of missing data should not be used to guide decisions on multiple imputation (2019, background): “Readers may wish to refer to the studies by Graham [2] and Donders et al [3] for intuitive explanations of these terms.”
- Developing prediction models for clinical use using logistic regression: an overview. (2019, background): “This avoids the biases inherent with simply removing subjects with missing data (3,10,12).”
- Multiple imputation with multivariate imputation by chained equation (MICE) package. (2016, background): “, overestimation of precision) and ignorance of uncertainty about estimation of missing values, MI, if performed properly can give an accurate estimate of real result (1).”