R. Harbord
Statistics and Probability · 2004–2012
A researcher in the Science corpus: 8 papers; trusts 21 researchers and is trusted by 24 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Statistics and Probability — 66 citations into it; #2,932 of 12,932 by trust here, #514 by citations
- Genetics — 27 citations into it; #2,119 of 6,854 by trust here, #1,927 by citations
- Economics and Econometrics — 14 citations into it; #12,937 of 23,481 by trust here, #2,335 by citations
- Surgery — 7 citations into it
Whom R. Harbord trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
- Johannes B Reitsma
- J. Deeks
- Carolyn M. Rutter
- J. Sterne
- George Davey Smith
- Matthias Egger
- Patrick M. M. Bossuyt
- A. Glas
- Constantine Gatsonis
- Christopher F. Baum
Who trusts R. Harbord overall
- R. Riley
- Dan Jackson
- John P. A. Ioannidis
- Stephen Burgess
- J. Bowden
- Lifeng Lin
- J. Theule
- Ian R. White
- E. Sanderson
- Siew S. Lim
Papers from R. Harbord's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers R. Harbord trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test data (Statistics in Medicine)
- Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines (BMC Medical Research Methodology)
- Systematic reviews in health care: Systematic reviews of evaluations of diagnostic and screening tests. (British medical journal)
- Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta‐regression (Statistics in Medicine)
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (PLoS ONE)
- Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (British medical journal)
- Are the clinical effects of homoeopathy placebo effects? Comparative study of placebo-controlled trials of homoeopathy and allopathy. (The Lancet)
- A Survey of Weak Instruments and Weak Identification in Generalized Method of Moments
- LARGE SAMPLE PROPERTIES OF GENERALIZED METHOD OF
- The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey (Canadian Medical Association Journal)
Their papers
- Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (2011) — 6,663 citations
- Using multiple genetic variants as instrumental variables for modifiable risk factors (2012) — 1,190 citations
- Metandi: Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy Using Hierarchical Logistic Regression (2009) — 459 citations
- A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. (2007) — 703 citations
- A modified test for small‐study effects in meta‐analyses of controlled trials with binary endpoints (2006) — 1,972 citations
- Metan: Fixed- and Random-Effects Meta-Analysis (2008) — 1,001 citations
- Funnel Plots in Meta-analysis (2004) — 601 citations
- Mendelian randomization: Using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in epidemiology (2008) — 3,762 citations