J. Barrett

Statistics and Probability · with Higgins · 2012–2013

A researcher in the Science corpus: 3 papers; trusts 20 researchers and is trusted by 10 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom J. Barrett trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. James M. Robins
  2. Susan A. Murphy
  3. Ian R. White
  4. Julian P. T. Higgins
  5. Stephen R. Cole
  6. A. P. Dawid
  7. Guobing Lu
  8. Miguel A. Hern'an
  9. A. Ades
  10. Thomas Lumley

Who trusts J. Barrett overall

  1. Ian R. White
  2. Georgia Salanti
  3. A. Chaimani
  4. Julian P. T. Higgins
  5. Adriani Nikolakopoulou
  6. Theodoros Papakonstantinou
  7. U. Krahn
  8. O. Efthimiou
  9. G. van Valkenhoef
  10. Harald Binder

Papers from J. Barrett's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers J. Barrett trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS
  2. Advanced methods in meta‐analysis: multivariate approach and meta‐regression (Statistics in Medicine)
  3. WinBUGS - A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility (Statistics and computing)
  4. Optimal Structural Nested Models for Optimal Sequential Decisions
  5. General methods for monitoring convergence of iterative simulations
  6. What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data. (Statistics in Medicine)
  7. Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta-regression (Research Synthesis Methods)
  8. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit
  9. Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment Comparisons
  10. A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis (Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A,)

Their papers