C. Mulrow

Statistics and Probability · 2001–2021

A researcher in the Science corpus: 11 papers; trusts 10 researchers and is trusted by 8 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Statistics and Probability — 284 citations into it; #6,612 of 12,932 by trust here, #138 by citations
• General Health Professions — 115 citations into it; #2,940 of 4,781 by trust here, #52 by citations
• Economics and Econometrics — 93 citations into it; #23,136 of 23,481 by trust here, #4,779 by citations
• Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health — 46 citations into it; #2,163 of 2,368 by trust here, #483 by citations
• Pharmacology — 29 citations into it
• History and Philosophy of Science — 26 citations into it
• Oncology — 5 citations into it

Whom C. Mulrow trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. David Moher
2. Douglas G. Altman
3. Julian P. T. Higgins
4. Matthew J. Page

Who trusts C. Mulrow overall

1. David Moher
2. Matthew J. Page
3. Douglas G. Altman

Papers from C. Mulrow's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers C. Mulrow trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (PLoS ONE)
2. Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (Medical Journal of Australia)
3. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. (International Journal of Surgery)
4. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations (British medical journal)
5. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (Statistics in Medicine)
6. Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review (Systematic Reviews)
7. Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons (Statistics in Medicine)
8. PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (Annals of Internal Medicine)
9. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (British medical journal)
10. PRISMA-S: an extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews (Journal of the Medical Library Association)

Their papers

• The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009) — 37,422 citations
• Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007) — 9,533 citations
• PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020) — 10,812 citations
• The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations (2015) — 6,672 citations
• Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. (2020) — 2,634 citations
• The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2020) — 94,440 citations
• Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. (2007) — 2,675 citations
• The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. (2021) — 3,176 citations
• The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021) — 25,061 citations
• Aspirin for the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2002) — 597 citations
• Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process. (2001) — 1,796 citations