The PRISMA Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions: Checklist and Explanations
By B. Hutton, Georgia Salanti, D. Caldwell, A. Chaimani, C. Schmid, C. Cameron, John P. A. Ioannidis, Sharon E. Straus, K. Thorlund, J. Jansen and 7 more. Annals of Internal Medicine, 2015
6,672 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3fa1f9a88d140c66fec756ca8f8f4ecee15e7120
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- Matthew J. Page
- David Moher
- J. Gurevitch
- J. Koricheva
- J. Yepes‐Nuñez
- Marta Romero-García
- G. Úrrutia
- S. Alonso-Fernández
In Statistics and Probability
- David Moher
- Matthew J. Page
- Larissa Shamseer
- I. Boutron
- J. Yepes‐Nuñez
- G. Úrrutia
- Marta Romero-García
- S. Alonso-Fernández
Citations in the corpus
- Effect of exercise for depression: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (2024, methodology): “34 We amended our analysis strategy after registering our review; these changes were to better align with new norms established by the Cochrane Comparing Multiple Interventions Methods Group.”
- Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension (2021, methodology): “Several extensions of PRISMA have been published to suit different types of reviews (e.g. PRISMA for Protocols, PRISMA for NetworkMeta-Analyses, and PRISMA for individual patient data: Hutton et al., 2015; Moher et al., 2015; Stewart et al., 2015).”
- netmeta: An R Package for Network Meta-Analysis Using Frequentist Methods (2023, neutral): “A concise way to present NMA results is a league table (Hutton et al. 2015) which is a square matrix showing all pairwise comparisons in an NMA.”
- The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021, methodology): “Finally, extensions to the PRISMA 2009 statement have been developed to guide reporting of network metaanalyses,[49] meta-analyses of individual participant data,[50] systematic reviews of harms, [51] systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies, [52] and scoping reviews [53]; for these ty”
- Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. (2020, methodology): “We constructed a sampling frame, consisting of all members of the PRISMA 2009 and PRISMA for Protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 Groups (25, 26), corresponding authors of all PRISMA extensions that were published (27-34) or in development at the time of the survey (35-38), editors in chief and associate edito”