Analytic-thinking predicts hoax beliefs and helping behaviors in response to the COVID-19 pandemic

By Matthew L. Stanley, Nathaniel Barr, Kelly Peters, Paul Seli. Thinking and Reasoning, 2020

87 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract The COVID-19 outbreak was labeled a global pandemic by the WHO in March of 2020. During that same month, the number of confirmed cases and the death rate grew exponentially in the United States, creating a serious public-health emergency. Unfortunately, many Americans dismissed the pandemic as a hoax and failed to properly engage in helpful behaviors like social-distancing and increased hand-washing. Here, we examine a disposition—engagement in analytic-thinking—that might predict beliefs that the pandemic is a hoax and failures to change behavior in positive ways during that critical early period in March. Our results indicate that individuals less likely to engage effortful, deliberative, and reflective cognitive processes were more likely to believe the pandemic was a hoax and less likely to have recently engaged in social-distancing and hand-washing in March. We discuss possible implications of these results for understanding and addressing the COVID-19 pandemic.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d2ec69e24d64753909d3effad90fa350581f8316

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Susceptibility to misinformation about COVID-19 around the world (2020, methodology): “Second, we explore how belief in COVID-19 misinformation influences the degree of current compliance with public health guidance such as wearing a mask in public [39].”