Greta L. Polites

Information Systems and Management · 2012

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 48 researchers and is trusted by 8 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Greta L. Polites trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Adamantios Diamantopoulos
  2. J. Edwards
  3. David Gefen
  4. Elena Karahanna
  5. Detmar W. Straub Jr.
  6. Stacie C. Petter
  7. Scott B. MacKenzie
  8. Cheryl Burke Jarvis
  9. Vivek Choudhury
  10. Bas Verplanken

Who trusts Greta L. Polites overall

  1. Christian Maier
  2. Yulia W. Sullivan
  3. Monideepa Tarafdar
  4. Sven Laumer
  5. Jesús Herrera Madueño
  6. Dan J Kim
  7. Ofir Turel
  8. Tim Weitzel
  9. Heshan Sun
  10. Patrick Besson

Papers from Greta L. Polites's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Greta L. Polites trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology
  2. Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice (Communications of the Association for Information Systems)
  3. Multidimensional Constructs in Organizational Behavior Research: An Integrative Analytical Framework
  4. Index Construction with Formative Indicators: An Alternative to Scale Development
  5. A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research
  6. Time Flies When You're Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage (MIS Q.)
  7. Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research (MIS Q.)
  8. The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  9. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. (Journal of Applied Psychology)
  10. Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. (Journal of Applied Psychology)

Their papers