Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research

By Stacie C. Petter, Detmar W. Straub Jr., Arun Rai. MIS Q., 2007

3,361 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Information Systems and Management, Management Information Systems

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/c3b1350c9a91708abc632823bc1fef90ecc3d309

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

In Information Systems and Management

In Management Information Systems

Citations in the corpus

Benefits of Mindfulness Meditation on Emotional Intelligence, General Self-Efficacy, and Perceived Stress: Evidence from Thailand (2014, background): “The VIFs ranged from 1.05 to 2.09, which is considerably below the critical value of 3.3 as suggested by Petter, Straub, and Rai (2007).”
Trust and knowledge sharing in diverse global virtual teams (2013, background): “All of the items together represent the underlying constructs of the instrument [21].”
Understanding the effect of social media marketing activities: The mediation of social identification, perceived value, and satisfaction (2019, methodology): “PLS was adopted because it is suitable for discussing the causal relationships between construct variables and can simultaneously handle the model constructs and measurement items (Petter et al., 2007).”
Advanced Mediating Effects Tests, Multi-Group Analyses, and Measurement Model Assessments in PLS-Based SEM (2014, methodology): “The VIF threshold of 3.3 has been recommended in the context of PLS-based SEM in discussions of formative latent variable measurement (Cenfetelli & Bassellier, 2009; Petter et al., 2007).”
Financing buyer–supplier dyads: an empirical analysis on financial collaboration in the supply chain (2016, methodology): “For the formative constructs, we ensured content and convergent validity by conducting a literature review to scope the domain of the construct and, subsequently, directing workshop with representatives from five industrial companies verifying the respective items (Petter, Straub, and Rai 2007).”
An integrative model of consumers' intentions to purchase travel online (2015, background): “, 1998), by providing detail on different facets of the construct (Petter et al., 2007).”
How Does IT Ambidexterity Impact Organizational Agility? (2015, background): “71); this is because they share the same underlying latent construct of agility (Petter et al. 2007).”
Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchial construct models: guidelines and impirical illustration (2009, methodology): “Finally, the choice for formative or reflective is and remains a substantive one (Diamantopolous and Winklhofer 2001; Jarvis et al. 2003, MacKenzie et al. 2005; Petter et al. 2007) and for experiential value the literature review indicates an all reflective approach for the hierarchical structure (s”
How Information Technology Governance Mechanisms and Strategic Alignment Influence Organizational Performance: Insights from a Matched Survey of Business and IT Managers (2015, methodology): “Finally, we use the VIF (variance inflation factor) statistic to determine whether the formative measures are correlated too highly (Petter et al. 2007).”
Detecting Common Method Bias: Performance of the Harman's Single-Factor Test (2019, methodology): “as Podsakoff et al. (2003) recommend, we employed Harman’s one-factor test”.”
Interfirm Strategic Information Flows in Logistics Supply Chain Relationships (2009, background): “In contrast, components-based SEM does not face the statistical identification challenges inherent in covariance-based approaches to formative modeling (Petter et al. 2007).”