S. Mao

Language and Linguistics · with Crosthwaite · 2019

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 3 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Language and Linguistics — 18 citations into it
• Education — 16 citations into it
• Literature and Literary Theory — 15 citations into it
• Developmental and Educational Psychology — 8 citations into it

Whom S. Mao trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. D. Ferris
2. Icy Lee
3. J. Bitchener
4. R. Ellis
5. Younghee Sheen
6. Jean Chandler

Papers from S. Mao's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers S. Mao trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. The Effect of Focused Written Corrective Feedback and Language Aptitude on ESL Learners´ Acquisition of Articles.
2. Response To Student Writing: Implications for Second Language Students
3. ERROR FEEDBACK IN L2 WRITING CLASSES: HOW EXPLICIT DOES IT NEED TO BE?
4. The Effect of Different Types of Corrective Feedback on ESL Student Writing.
5. THE EFFICACY OF VARIOUS KINDS OF ERROR FEEDBACK FOR IMPROVEMENT IN THE ACCURACY AND FLUENCY OF L2 STUDENT WRITING
6. Written Corrective Feedback in Second Language Acquisition and Writing
7. Feedback in Second Language Writing: Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction
8. Peer Response in Second Language Writing Classrooms
9. Patterns of Teacher Response to Student Writing in a Multiple-Draft Composition Classroom: Is Content Feedback Followed by Form Feedback the Best Method?
10. Evidence in Support of Written Corrective Feedback.

Their papers

• Investigating written corrective feedback: (Mis)alignment of teachers’ beliefs and practice (2019) — 149 citations