Sylvie Chollet

Food Science · 2001–2012

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 2 researchers and is trusted by 4 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Food Science — 26 citations into it; #686 of 1,700 by trust here, #758 by citations
• Nutrition and Dietetics — 19 citations into it; #870 of 1,029 by trust here, #738 by citations
• Experimental and Cognitive Psychology — 10 citations into it; #4,718 of 9,731 by trust here, #4,714 by citations

Whom Sylvie Chollet trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Dominique Valentin

Who trusts Sylvie Chollet overall

1. Dominique Valentin
2. G. Ares
3. Lukas Danner
4. Paula Varela

Papers from Sylvie Chollet's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Sylvie Chollet trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. IMPACT OF TRAINING ON BEER FLAVOR PERCEPTION AND DESCRIPTION: ARE TRAINED AND UNTRAINED SUBJECTS REALLY DIFFERENT?
2. The knowing nose: the role of knowledge in wine expertise
3. Theory and Methods of Scaling.
4. A Factorial Approach for Sorting Task data (FAST)
5. Procrustes Problems
6. Culture and systems of thought: holistic versus analytic cognition. (Psychology Review)
7. Use of an open-ended question to identify drivers of liking of milk desserts. Comparison with preference mapping techniques
8. Correspondence analysis
9. Applied Mixed Models in Medicine (Technometrics)
10. Exploratory Multivariate Analysis by Example Using R

Their papers

• Invited review Quick and dirty but still pretty good: a review of new descriptive methods in food science (2012) — 356 citations
• IMPACT OF TRAINING ON BEER FLAVOR PERCEPTION AND DESCRIPTION: ARE TRAINED AND UNTRAINED SUBJECTS REALLY DIFFERENT? (2001) — 124 citations